2013
DOI: 10.3106/041.038.0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Position ofCallosciurus erythraeus griseimanusfrom Vietnam in the GenusCallosciurus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…hendeei and C. finlaysonii (Oshida et al 2013). Interestingly, C. e. griseimanus proved to be more closely related to C. finlaysonii; however, genetic distances among the three forms were very similar, suggesting a polytomic phylogenetic relationship which remained unresolved (Oshida et al 2013). Using the same Cyt b marker, we could not resolve the relationship between these species, as in the previous study by Oshida et al (2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…hendeei and C. finlaysonii (Oshida et al 2013). Interestingly, C. e. griseimanus proved to be more closely related to C. finlaysonii; however, genetic distances among the three forms were very similar, suggesting a polytomic phylogenetic relationship which remained unresolved (Oshida et al 2013). Using the same Cyt b marker, we could not resolve the relationship between these species, as in the previous study by Oshida et al (2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Interestingly, C. e. griseimanus proved to be more closely related to C. finlaysonii; however, genetic distances among the three forms were very similar, suggesting a polytomic phylogenetic relationship which remained unresolved (Oshida et al 2013). Using the same Cyt b marker, we could not resolve the relationship between these species, as in the previous study by Oshida et al (2013). However, the monophyletic group formed by C. e. grisemaneus from Vietnam was supported by our analyses (molecular phylogenetic approach and ABGD method) and was used as an independent group to estimate genetic distances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations