2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic placement and species delimitation of the crab spider genus Phrynarachne (Araneae: Thomisidae) from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in speciation rates, population size and sampling bias may cause over‐ or underestimation of the number of species (Pentinsaari et al, 2017; Renner et al, 2017; Talavera et al, 2013). The multi‐locus method of BPP has been shown to be more reliable than single‐locus methods for species delimitation (Leaché et al, 2016; Xu et al, 2022; Yang & Rannala, 2010) and usually better reflects observations of morphological divergence (Lin et al, 2018; Yang & Rannala, 2017). Nevertheless, some authors have cast doubt on the ability of multispecies coalescent‐based methods such as BPP to delimit species consistently (Leaché et al, 2019; Sukumaran & Knowles, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in speciation rates, population size and sampling bias may cause over‐ or underestimation of the number of species (Pentinsaari et al, 2017; Renner et al, 2017; Talavera et al, 2013). The multi‐locus method of BPP has been shown to be more reliable than single‐locus methods for species delimitation (Leaché et al, 2016; Xu et al, 2022; Yang & Rannala, 2010) and usually better reflects observations of morphological divergence (Lin et al, 2018; Yang & Rannala, 2017). Nevertheless, some authors have cast doubt on the ability of multispecies coalescent‐based methods such as BPP to delimit species consistently (Leaché et al, 2019; Sukumaran & Knowles, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partial fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (CO1) gene was amplified and sequenced for one male and one female specimen, respectively, using the primers LCOI1490 (5’-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTG-3’) and HCOI2198 (5’-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAAT-3’) ( Folmer et al 1994 ). For additional information on extraction, amplification and sequencing procedures, see Xu et al (2022) . Sequences were trimmed to 652 bp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%