ABSTRACT. We compared craniodental morphology among 5 populations of the Siberian weasel Mustela sibirica including 2 insular ones (Tsushima and Taiwan). Skulls of the insular individuals tended to be smaller than those of continental ones. Shape differences were also detected, but not so pronounced. Considering these results, the Taiwan population should be regarded as a distinct subspecies M. s. taivana from the mainland ones. The Tsushima population may also possibly be a distinct subspecies from the mainland ones, but more detailed studies using a larger number of specimens are needed for a conclusion. The introduced population in Honshu is also differentiated from the source population. This suggests a high morphological plasticity in M. sibirica. The Siberian weasel Mustela sibirica is one of the most widely distributed species among East Asian species of the Carnivora. Due to its wide distribution and habitat diversity, there should be considerable geographic variations. In fact, several authors have reported geographic variation in the skulls [2,18]. In addition, the fact that many subspecies have been described should reflect their high morphological variability. However, the whole picture of geographic variations has not been clarified, and morphological differences among subspecies have not been well defined. Descriptions of subspecies in many cases have been based on comparisons of a small number of specimens, and statistical analyses have not been conducted. Therefore, re-examinations of subspecies considering variations within each population are needed.The focus of this study is on insular variation, an important characteristic in M. sibirica. In many species of Carnivora, insular populations are often differentiated from mainland ones [9,[12][13][14], and have often been described as distinct subspecies. Two subspecies of M. sibirica from islands (M. s. taivana from Taiwan and M. s. quelpartis from Cheju Island, Korea) have been described [22,23]. Furthermore, the Tsushima population is possibly an independent subspecies [1, 2]. However, comparative morphological studies using these insular and nearby mainland populations have not been done. In this study, the craniodental morphology in insular and mainland populations of M. sibirica, which belong to different (or possibly different) subspecies, was compared.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study specimens:In this study, specimens of M. sibirica from 5 localities (Fig. 1) were compared. It is well known *CorrespondenCe to: Kimura, J.,