2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00037-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
377
1
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(394 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
12
377
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that species of beetles in central and northern Europe experienced dramatic distributional shifts during the Pleistocene (see Elias, 1994 for a review), and that in many cases the present range of the species is only a random o quasirandom subset of what could have been its historical range, thus erasing any possibility of inferring its geographical origin or mode of speciation (Roy et al 1996;Losos & Glor 2003). However, under this scenario the expected distribution of sister species would also be random, i.e.…”
Section: Geographical Origin Of the Iberian Endemicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that species of beetles in central and northern Europe experienced dramatic distributional shifts during the Pleistocene (see Elias, 1994 for a review), and that in many cases the present range of the species is only a random o quasirandom subset of what could have been its historical range, thus erasing any possibility of inferring its geographical origin or mode of speciation (Roy et al 1996;Losos & Glor 2003). However, under this scenario the expected distribution of sister species would also be random, i.e.…”
Section: Geographical Origin Of the Iberian Endemicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although highly controversial (e.g. Losos & Glor, 2003), this method nonetheless sparked a series of forward steps in objective study of modes of speciation (Fitzpatrick et al, 2009;Kozak et al, 2009). We see a mature version of biodiversity informatics as presenting many opportunities for a much richer and more integrative view of both biotic interactions and biological diversification together, again broadening the mission of systematics considerably (Cracraft, 2002).…”
Section: Biota-wide Picture Of Diversification and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographic distributions and niche estimates for species represent additional key elements, showing the relationships of those same taxa in geographic space (across diverse spatial scales) and in environmental dimensions. Finally, new approaches for estimating past distributional patterns (see above) can be marshalled to alleviate problems with labile distributions and the confusion that they insert regarding spatial relations between taxa (Losos & Glor, 2003). The result would be a view of phylogeny and distribution that incorporates information offered by ecological dimensions (Peterson et al, 1999) and likely shifts in distributions over recent planetary history (Wells, 1983).…”
Section: Biota-wide Picture Of Diversification and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their evidence to support this comes from an 'Age-Range Correlation' plot, or plot of the degree of range overlap against time since divergence. The interpretation of such plots is controversial, and in particular is confounded by range movement after speciation (Losos and Glor, 2003). Another problem is that the definition of species in allopatry is necessarily subjective under the Biological Species Concept.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%