2020
DOI: 10.3390/d12120481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Assessment of Freshwater Mussels Castalia ambigua and C. inflata at an Ecotone in the Paraguay River Basin, Brazil Shows That Inflated and Compressed Shell Morphotypes Are the Same Species

Abstract: The phylogeny and taxonomy of freshwater mussels of the genus Castalia in South America is complicated by issues of morphological plasticity and limited molecular genetic data. We present field data on the distributions of the nominal Castalia ambigua and C. inflata in the upper Paraguay River basin in Brazil based on original occurrence data at 23 sample sites and on historical records. The upper basin has distinct highland and lowland regions, the latter including the Pantanal wetland, where “C. ambigua” occ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mussels may have variation in shell features that are di cult to locate and quantify (Froufe et al, 2016), and shape analysis using outlines may deal effectively with these more subtle changes (Haines & Crampton, 2000). Shell shape variation in South American freshwater mussels has been generally evaluated using traditional linear descriptors (Mansur & Valer, 1992;Mansur et al, 1997;Olivera-Hyde et al, 2020). However, these approaches may mask ecophenotypic responses: e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mussels may have variation in shell features that are di cult to locate and quantify (Froufe et al, 2016), and shape analysis using outlines may deal effectively with these more subtle changes (Haines & Crampton, 2000). Shell shape variation in South American freshwater mussels has been generally evaluated using traditional linear descriptors (Mansur & Valer, 1992;Mansur et al, 1997;Olivera-Hyde et al, 2020). However, these approaches may mask ecophenotypic responses: e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, an underlying process explaining this ecophenotypic pattern is unknown. Many integrative studies using morphometric, molecular phylogenetic, and/or population genetic tools have failed to find genetic correlation with ecophenotypic variation (Baker et al 2003; Cyr et al 2007; Inoue et al 2013; Olivera-Hyde et al 2020; Zieritz et al 2010) leading to phenotypic plasticity as the default explanation for all intraspecific morphological variation in freshwater mussels (Inoue et al 2013; Zieritz et al 2010; Hornbach et al 2010; Jeratthitikul et al 2019; Sheldon 2017; Wu et al 2022). Although these molecular studies provide compelling evidence supporting phenotypic plasticity, they do not sequence markers involved in shell production and thus genetic mechanisms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South America has approximately 168 native species of freshwater mussels, with species of the genus Castalia Lamarck, 1819 (Unionida: Hyriidae) distributed across the main river basins (Olivera‐Hyde et al, 2020 ). In particular, the species C. ambigua is found in the Amazon, Paraguay, and Paraná River basins and has a restricted distribution in the Uruguay River basin (Pereira et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this species is mainly associated with areas of low hydrodynamic energy in river margins with poorly compacted sandy substrates and low silt deposition (Simeone et al, 2021c ). Molecular and linear morphometric analyses demonstrated that C. ambigua in the upper Paraguay River has phenotypic variation expressed as two morphotypes: one laterally compressed and another inflated (Olivera‐Hyde et al, 2020 ). In the eastern Amazon, Simeone et al ( 2022 ) using outline morphometric analyses, observed two co‐occurring morphotypes of C. ambigua in the Caeté River (Figure 1 ), that are shaped by sexual dimorphism in habitats with reduced hydraulic energy (Reynolds number of 855 ± 94.6): the first morphotype has an elongate posterior margin and is laterally compressed (male specimens), and the second has rounded anterior–posterior margins and is laterally inflated (female specimens).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%