2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-018-3678-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic annotation and genomic architecture of opsin genes in Crustacea

Abstract: 19A major goal of evolutionary biology is to understand the role of adaptive processes on 20 sensory systems. Visual capabilities are strongly influenced by environmental and 21 ecological conditions, and the evolutionary advantages of vision are manifest by its 22 29 developed a modified version of the Phylogenetically Informed Annotation tool to filter 30 and identify visual genes from transcriptomes in a scalable and efficient manner. 31 Additionally, reference genomes of these species were used to va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tissue‐specific (eye and photophore) reference transcriptomes were assembled de novo with Trinity v2.8.4 (Grabherr et al., 2011; Haas et al., 2013) using in silico read normalization, a minimum contig length of 200 bp and a k‐mer size of 23, which has proven to be the optimal k‐mer size for these crustacean RNA‐seq data sets (i.e. Bracken‐Grissom et al, 2020; Pérez‐Moreno, DeLeo, Palero, & Bracken‐Grissom, 2018). A comprehensive reference assembly containing both tissue types was also assembled for downstream gene expression comparisons between tissue types.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tissue‐specific (eye and photophore) reference transcriptomes were assembled de novo with Trinity v2.8.4 (Grabherr et al., 2011; Haas et al., 2013) using in silico read normalization, a minimum contig length of 200 bp and a k‐mer size of 23, which has proven to be the optimal k‐mer size for these crustacean RNA‐seq data sets (i.e. Bracken‐Grissom et al, 2020; Pérez‐Moreno, DeLeo, Palero, & Bracken‐Grissom, 2018). A comprehensive reference assembly containing both tissue types was also assembled for downstream gene expression comparisons between tissue types.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each tissue‐specific transcriptome was analysed using the Phylogenetically‐Informed Annotation (PIA) tool (Speiser et al., 2014), modified for command‐line use (Pérez‐Moreno et al, 2018), which characterizes putative visual opsins and phototransduction pathway genes in a phylogenetic context. Assemblies were run through PIA using a pipeline previously described in Pérez‐Moreno et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Page -39with all crab data restricted to only a few eubrachyurans. Nevertheless, visual pigments play a critical role in the activation of the phototransduction signaling cascade, and consist of an opsin protein bound to a chromophore (Pérez-Moreno et al, 2018). To date, the few studies that use 825!…”
Section: Visual Pigments and Phototransductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As genomic data are generated for additional crab species, visual pigments should be targeted by eye-specific transcriptomics and/or the design of genomic probes based on 890! previous visual pigment annotations (Speiser et al, 2014;Schott et al, 2017;Pérez-Moreno et al, 2018). Tracing the evolution of photoreceptor genes and eye morphology across a robust crab tree could be an informative first step to reconstructing the evolutionary history of vision across this iconic group.…”
Section: !mentioning
confidence: 99%