2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic and phenotypic relationships of the Triatoma sordida subcomplex (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panzera et al, 22 considering the species T. sordida, T. patagonica, T. guasayana, and T. garciabesi, suggested cryptic speciation for the T. sordida subcomplex proposed by Schofield and Galvão 48 (currently the T. sordida subcomplex is a monophyletic group formed by the species T. sordida, T. rosai, T. garciabesi, T. jurbergi, T. matogrossensis, and T. vandae). 6,49 However, even if subtle, there are morphological and/or morphometric differences between all studied species. 24,25,[50][51][52][53] Besides, our results point out significant morphological/morphometric differences between T. rosai and T. sordida (Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay) and between the different T. sordida populations from Brazil, Bolivia, and Paraguay, confirming the morphology/morphometry data presented by Alevi et al 6 and geometric morphometry data presented by Naterro et al 25 Therefore, once more, the term cryptic speciation does not apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panzera et al, 22 considering the species T. sordida, T. patagonica, T. guasayana, and T. garciabesi, suggested cryptic speciation for the T. sordida subcomplex proposed by Schofield and Galvão 48 (currently the T. sordida subcomplex is a monophyletic group formed by the species T. sordida, T. rosai, T. garciabesi, T. jurbergi, T. matogrossensis, and T. vandae). 6,49 However, even if subtle, there are morphological and/or morphometric differences between all studied species. 24,25,[50][51][52][53] Besides, our results point out significant morphological/morphometric differences between T. rosai and T. sordida (Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay) and between the different T. sordida populations from Brazil, Bolivia, and Paraguay, confirming the morphology/morphometry data presented by Alevi et al 6 and geometric morphometry data presented by Naterro et al 25 Therefore, once more, the term cryptic speciation does not apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently two subcomplexes of the genus Triatoma were studied by means of geometric morphometrics, which indicated the potential of the technique to study specimens that are phylogenetically close [43,45]. Geometric morphometrics allowed describing the differences in head shape and size of the ve nymphal instars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique is used in paleontological, anthropological, ecological, zoological, and botanical studies [29,33]. In triatomines, geometric morphometry is used to assess the shape and size variables of hemelytra [43,44], heads [12,45], and eggs [46]. Also, for ontogenetic studies [47,48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Triatominae, biometric studies are used to characterize new species, detect populations, and define structures 18 . For example, geometric morphometry allows the collection of information about the shape and size of organisms, which helps in systematic and phylogenetic studies 10 , 19 , 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%