2013
DOI: 10.1080/17451000.2013.765578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic and geographic variation of northern Australian sympatric lineages ofTreptopale homalosandT. paromolos(Annelida: Phyllodocida: Chrysopetalidae) using mitochondrial and nuclear sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13) and the lack of additional genes for three of the Hyalopale species included here (Table 1) precludes any strong conclusions. based on their similar anterior end configurations and chaetal types (Perkins 1985;Watson 2010;Watson 2015;Watson & Faulwetter 2017); a molecular study also corroborated a very close relationship between Treptopale and Paleanotus (Wei et al 2013). Buccal structures, internal pigmentation and gamete characters are considered in more detail here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13) and the lack of additional genes for three of the Hyalopale species included here (Table 1) precludes any strong conclusions. based on their similar anterior end configurations and chaetal types (Perkins 1985;Watson 2010;Watson 2015;Watson & Faulwetter 2017); a molecular study also corroborated a very close relationship between Treptopale and Paleanotus (Wei et al 2013). Buccal structures, internal pigmentation and gamete characters are considered in more detail here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…While there are differences in the numbers of ribs and presence/absence of a midline spine, the similarities indicate these may be sister species. This northern Australia sibling species divide has been documented in a number of related chrysopetalid taxa e.g., Paleanotus (Watson 2015) and Treptopale (Watson 2010;Wei et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Within the eight chrysopetalid genera known in the GBR, six comprise cryptic species complexes i.e. morphological differences are difficult to see between species with only minor shape differences, numbers of paleal types or ribs or no observable charcters present (e.g., Arichlidon: Watson Russell 1998; Treptopale: Watson 2010; Wei et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryptic speciation in annelids, with little or no discernable morphological differences, is being demonstrated by molecular sequence data with increasing frequency (e.g. Borda et al ., ; Stiller et al ., ; Wei, Watson & Gibb, ). Conversely, markedly different morphologies and a lack of rigorous systematics have sometimes resulted in different families being established that have later been collapsed into a single taxon following molecular systematics; Chrysopetalidae is a case in point (Aguado, Nygren & Rouse, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%