1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00166617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Analysis of the Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Abstract: Numerous aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase sequences have been aligned by computer and phylogenetic trees constructed from them for the two classes of these enzymes. Branching orders based on a consensus of these trees have been proposed for the two groups. Although the order of appearance can be rationalized to fit many different scenarios having to do with the genetic code, the invention of a system for translating nucleic acid sequences into polypeptide chains must have predated the existence of these proteins. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
89
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analysis supports that, with few exceptions, each synthetase family was present at the time of the LUCA, and inherited by each of the 3 major domains of life (Nagel and Doolittle 1995). Consequently, within each synthetase class numerous divergence events happened before the LUCA, each one a point at which the genetic code may have increased in complexity, either adding a new amino acid (neofunctionalization), or resolving a previously ambiguous specificity into two distinct amino acids (subfunctionalization).…”
Section: The Question Becomes At What Point Did Protein Synthetases mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Phylogenetic analysis supports that, with few exceptions, each synthetase family was present at the time of the LUCA, and inherited by each of the 3 major domains of life (Nagel and Doolittle 1995). Consequently, within each synthetase class numerous divergence events happened before the LUCA, each one a point at which the genetic code may have increased in complexity, either adding a new amino acid (neofunctionalization), or resolving a previously ambiguous specificity into two distinct amino acids (subfunctionalization).…”
Section: The Question Becomes At What Point Did Protein Synthetases mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As the clues to such a hypothetical mechanism are very scarce, it is common practice to look for patterns in either one of the key constituents of the codon identity, namely, tRNAs (Eigen et al 1989;Nicholas and McClain 1995) or aaRSs (Eriani et al 1990;Ribas de Pouplana and Schimmel 2001a), and their respective evolution deduced from phylogenetic methods (Nagel and Doolittle 1995;Woese et al 2000). In the case of aaRSs, the phylogeny is complicated by a number of horizontal transfers (Wolf et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their ancient history, well-understood role, and high degree of conservation, they have been natural choices for many phylogenetic studies (Brown and Doolittle 1995;DiazLazcoz et al 1998;Hashimoto et al 1998;Kim et al 1998;Nagel and Doolittle 1995;Shiba et al 1998;Taupin and Leberman 1999;Wolf et al 1999). Unfortunately (in some respects), it appears that the evolutionary history of aaRS genes has not always been straightforward, with several proposed examples of gene duplications, fusions, and gain by horizontal transfer (DiazLazcoz et al 1998;Doolittle and Handy 1998;Lamour et al 1994;Wolf et al 1999;Handy and Doolittle 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%