1991
DOI: 10.2307/1381979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Analysis of Recent Procyonid Genera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
103
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
103
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…36; Fig. 5b and Baskin 1989Baskin , 2004Decker and Wozencraft 1991;Ahrens 2012). However, molecular data analyses (Koepfli et al 2007;Eizirik et al 2010) have contested the groupings obtained with morphological data alone by considering that morphology-based assessments reflect convergences associated with similar lifestyles and diets rather than ancestry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36; Fig. 5b and Baskin 1989Baskin , 2004Decker and Wozencraft 1991;Ahrens 2012). However, molecular data analyses (Koepfli et al 2007;Eizirik et al 2010) have contested the groupings obtained with morphological data alone by considering that morphology-based assessments reflect convergences associated with similar lifestyles and diets rather than ancestry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among recent studies, only Peters (1982) and but see Czelusniak et al, 1991) dissent from this view. Support for a monophyletic Procyonidae comes from Seal, Phillips & Erickson (1970), Baskin (1982Baskin ( , 1989, Wozencraft (1989), and Decker & Wozencraft (1991). While growing evidence exists that the mephitines are only distantly related to the remaining mustelids (Arnason & Widegren, 1986 ;Wayne et al, 1989 a ;Arnason & Ledje, 1993 ;Ledje & Arnason, 1996), this claim still requires further substantiation.…”
Section: Methodology (1) Mechanics and Limitations Of Matrix Repmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison with other procyonids, this level of genetic distinction is equivalent to the 10–11% divergence between Procyon lotor and Procyon cancrivorus , sympatrically-occurring raccoons traditionally classified in separate subgenera (Goldman 1950, Helgen and Wilson 2005), and comparable to the 9–13% divergence between Nasua narica and Nasuella olivacea (Helgen et al 2009), coatis traditionally classified in separate genera (Hollister 1915, Decker and Wozencraft 1991, Wozencraft 1993, 2005). …”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such a widespread genus of Carnivora, olingos were discovered surprisingly late (first described from Central America in 1876 and from South America in 1880; Allen 1876, Thomas 1880); they were long known by few specimens in museum collections; they are often overlooked in the field because they are regularly confused with another better known procyonid, the kinkajou, Potos flavus (Schreber, 1774) (e.g., Thomas 1880, Manville 1956, Ford and Hoffmann 1988, Sampaio et al 2011); and they are often largely or entirely omitted from both authoritative and popular references on Neotropical wildlife and natural history (e.g., Janzen 1983, Henderson 2002, Lord 2007). In the absence of a detailed systematic review, five species of Bassaricyon are tentatively recognized in most recent taxonomic references, including three species in Central America ( Bassaricyon gabbii Allen, 1876; Bassaricyon lasius Harris, 1932; Bassaricyon pauli Enders, 1936) and three species in South America (with Bassaricyon gabbii recognized as occurring west of the Andes, and Bassaricyon alleni Thomas, 1880 and Bassaricyon beddardi Pocock, 1921a east of the Andes), but most authors have explicitly identified a longstanding need for a detailed taxonomic overview to clarify species diversity and distributions in this genus (Cabrera 1958, Decker and Wozencraft 1991, Eisenberg 1989, Eisenberg and Redford 1999, Eizirik 2012, Emmons 1990, 1997, Ewer 1973, Glatston 1994, González-Maya et al 2011, Hall 1981, Hall and Kelson 1959, Helgen et al 2008c, Hunter 2011, Kays 2009, Kays and Russell 2001, Nowak 1999, Poglayen-Neuwall and Poglayen-Neuwall 1965, Prange and Prange 2009, Reid 1997, 2009, Reid and Helgen 2008a, 2008b, 2008c, Russell 1984, Samudio et al 2008, Stains 1967, Wozencraft 1989, 1993, 2005, Zeveloff 2002). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%