Annual Plant Reviews Volume 45 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118305881.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Analyses and Morphological Innovations in Land Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 239 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Marattiales, which has an extensive fossil record from the Carboniferous, all the fossils have planated leaves, thus giving no evidence as to the sequence of steps in how their leaves evolved (Rothwell and Stockey, 1989; Rothwell, 1996). Fossil evidence supports the view that Equisetum (sphenopsids) leaves were derived from a single dichotomous branch (Lignier, 1908 in Kenrick and Crane, 1997), and that Marattiales and leptosporangiate ferns have basically compound leaves more probably derived from whole branch systems bearing dichotomous appendages (Doyle, 2013). …”
Section: The Evolution Of Leaves In Fernsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For the Marattiales, which has an extensive fossil record from the Carboniferous, all the fossils have planated leaves, thus giving no evidence as to the sequence of steps in how their leaves evolved (Rothwell and Stockey, 1989; Rothwell, 1996). Fossil evidence supports the view that Equisetum (sphenopsids) leaves were derived from a single dichotomous branch (Lignier, 1908 in Kenrick and Crane, 1997), and that Marattiales and leptosporangiate ferns have basically compound leaves more probably derived from whole branch systems bearing dichotomous appendages (Doyle, 2013). …”
Section: The Evolution Of Leaves In Fernsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In addition, the strength of the fossil evidence supporting independent root evolution has been called into question, due to its incomplete nature and the poor preservation of fossilized roots, leading some to consider the origin of roots an unsettled issue (Gensel, 2008). Thus, it is conceivable that the common ancestor of lycophytes and euphyllophytes had already possessed a rudimentary root developmental program, perhaps generating a transitional "rooty structure" (Doyle, 2013) that was subsequently modified. It will be necessary to conduct detailed studies of individual root genes identified here (e.g., the root cap genes) to determine whether their similarity in sequence and expression across species is mirrored by similarity in developmental function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of plants on land over 400 million years ago represented a critical stage in the history of life on Earth (Kenrick and Crane, 1997;Raven and Edwards, 2001;Gensel, 2008;Doyle, 2013). This transition was associated with numerous physiological and developmental innovations in plants, including in some lineages, the evolution of an exploratory multicellular subterranean organ (the root) suited for effective water and nutrient acquisition and plant anchorage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They probably arose twice, once in the fern lineage and once in lycopods (Pires & Dolan, ). Hence, the emergence of the complex sporophyte body was accompanied by the emergence of roots (Graham et al ., ; Doyle, ). Phylogenetically early‐branching bryophytes also form root‐like rhizoids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%