Phyllody of Chrysanthemum and the Eriophyid Mite, Paraphytoptus Chrysanthemi Keifer1

Breakey, E. P.; Batchelor, G. S.

doi:10.1093/aesa/43.4.492

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(Petanović et al 1997) were later associated also to phytoplasma presence (Rancic et al 2005). Similarly, the Paraphytoptus chrysanthemi K. and phytoplasmas belonging to 16SXII-A ribosomal subgroup ("stolbur") were identified in chrysanthemum plants showing the same symptoms (Breakey & Batchelor 1950;Duduk et al 2006). Aceria spartii (Can.)…”

Section: Aq21mentioning

confidence: 97%

Association ofEriophyes dimocarpi(Acari: Eriophyidae) with longan witches’ broom disease in Vietnam

Hoat

Quan

Hao

et al. 2016

Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Please find attached the proofs for your article.1. Please check these proofs carefully. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to check these and approve or amend them. A second proof is not normally provided. Taylor & Francis cannot be held responsible for uncorrected errors, even if introduced during the production process. Once your corrections have been added to the article, it will be considered ready for publicationPlease limit changes at this stage to the correction of errors. You should not make trivial changes, improve prose style, add new material, or delete existing material at this stage. You may be charged if your corrections are excessive (we would not expect corrections to exceed 30 changes).For detailed guidance on how to check your proofs, please paste this address into a new browser window: http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/production/checkingproofs.asp Your PDF proof file has been enabled so that you can comment on the proof directly using Adobe Acrobat. If you wish to do this, please save the file to your hard disk first. For further information on marking corrections using Acrobat, please paste this address into a new browser window:http:// journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/production/acrobat.asp

show abstract

Section: Aq21mentioning

confidence: 97%

Association ofEriophyes dimocarpi(Acari: Eriophyidae) with longan witches’ broom disease in Vietnam

Hoat

Quan

Hao

et al. 2016

Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this plant 16SrIII-B subgroup phytoplasma was reported for the first time (Rancic et al 2005). Similarly, an interesting relationship between the feeding of Paraphytoptus chrysanthemi K. and phyllody, changes of floral organs into vegetative ones and stunted internodes of chrysanthemum plants, was registered decades ago (Breakey and Batchelor 1950). Damage includes the stunting and curling of apical leaves, as well as bronzing, while leaves become brittle and bud clustering results in brooming.…”

Section: Complex and Mixed Symptoms Induced By Eriophyoid Mite Feedinmentioning

confidence: 97%

Plant–eriophyoid mite interactions: specific and unspecific morphological alterations. Part II

Petanović

Kiełkiewicz

2009

Exp Appl Acarol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This explains why the first symptoms are always found in the stamens (de Munk and Beijer, 1971). Bud necrosis in tulips resembles certain disorders caused by mites in other crops, such as bud necrosis in carnations (Stewart and Hodgkiss, 1908;Heald, 1928;Cooper, 1940;Andreucci, 1962), phyllody of chrysanthemums (Breakey and Batchelor, 1950;French, et al, 1968), and flower bud necrosis in Michaelmas Daisies (Harris, 1968). Carter (1962) reports a number of disorders caused by mites of the eriophyid type which kill or injure young buds.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bud necrosis, a storage disease of tulips. III. The influence of ethylene and mites

Munk¹

1972

Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experiments demonstrated that bud necrosis in tulip bulbs is caused by mites that penetrate the flower bud during storage. This penetration is only possible if the buds, which are normally closed, are open at their tips. Such buds were found after administration of ethylene (3 ppm) during storage at 20~ shortly after lifting and in 'Red Champion' also after storage at higher temperatures (20 to 23 ~ in ethylene-free atmospheres. Open buds, caused by ethylene, resulted from unequal growth inhibition of the young leaves and stamens. The difference in sensitivity of both organs to ethylene decreased during storage. Later on, the growth inhibition of stamens and leaves became equal, and the buds remained closed. Then ethylene caused blasting of the flower buds. Open buds in 'Red Champion', caused by higher storage temperatures, resulted from aberrant differentiation of the tips of the young leaves.

show abstract

Phyllody of Chrysanthemum and the Eriophyid Mite, Paraphytoptus Chrysanthemi Keifer1

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Association ofEriophyes dimocarpi(Acari: Eriophyidae) with longan witches’ broom disease in Vietnam

Association ofEriophyes dimocarpi(Acari: Eriophyidae) with longan witches’ broom disease in Vietnam

Plant–eriophyoid mite interactions: specific and unspecific morphological alterations. Part II

Bud necrosis, a storage disease of tulips. III. The influence of ethylene and mites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About