2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-9750(03)00130-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phycoremediation: key issues for cost-effective nutrient removal processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
127
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a mixed culture was previously found to lead to an increase in overall methionine content, in plant tissue, as compared to monoculture (Ismail 1998), biomass and starch contents were not discussed. Some researchers also presumed that mixed cultures of certain favorable microalgae candidates may increase biomass production due to inherent advantages that optimize the system performance (Olguin 2003), but this has not been properly investigated. Therefore, it is still necessary to evaluate whether mixed cultures of duckweed can enhance metal recovery and biomass production, as compared to monocultures, in metal-containing wastewaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a mixed culture was previously found to lead to an increase in overall methionine content, in plant tissue, as compared to monoculture (Ismail 1998), biomass and starch contents were not discussed. Some researchers also presumed that mixed cultures of certain favorable microalgae candidates may increase biomass production due to inherent advantages that optimize the system performance (Olguin 2003), but this has not been properly investigated. Therefore, it is still necessary to evaluate whether mixed cultures of duckweed can enhance metal recovery and biomass production, as compared to monocultures, in metal-containing wastewaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of cyanobacteria for treatment of wastewater is dependent on their robustness against wastewater as well as their ability to grow under such conditions while absorbing nutrients from the wastewater (Olguín, 2003). In the present study, the cyanobacterium Geitlerinema sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, it is essential to choose a suitable harvest and concentration technology in the novel process. The common harvesting techniques for microalgal biomass include natural sedimentation (Grenn et al, 1996), flocculation (Munoz and Guieysse, 2006), flotation (Grenn et al, 1996), mobilization (Olguín, 2003), centrifugation (Chisti, 2007), filtration and membrane separation. Among all these techniques, membrane separation …”
Section: Harvest Of Microalgal Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%