2010
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phrenic nerve afferent activation of neurons in the cat SI cerebral cortex

Abstract: Stimulation of respiratory afferents elicits neural activity in the somatosensory region of the cerebral cortex in humans and animals. Respiratory afferents have been stimulated with mechanical loads applied to breathing and electrical stimulation of respiratory nerves and muscles. It was hypothesized that stimulation of the phrenic nerve myelinated afferents will activate neurons in the 3a and 3b region of the somatosensory cortex. This was investigated in cats with electrical stimulation of the intrathoracic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respiration-related nuclei project to the locus coeruleus, and sighing can change arousal levels (Yackle and others 2017), but respiration by itself probably does not drive time-locked brain-wide electrical responses (Parabucki and Lampl 2017). As the somatosensory cortex receives sensory input from the phrenic nerve (Davenport and others 2010), movement of the torso during respiration may drive bilateral somatosensory activation, and slow modulation of respiration would cause corresponding slow variations in neural activity in the trunk and visceral representations in somatosensory cortex. The confounds of respiration on brain-wide BOLD signals (the so-called “global signal”) are well known (Birn and others 2008a; Birn and others 2008b; Birn and others 2009; Murphy and others 2013).…”
Section: Respiration and Sniffing Behaviors Are Modulated By Tasks Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiration-related nuclei project to the locus coeruleus, and sighing can change arousal levels (Yackle and others 2017), but respiration by itself probably does not drive time-locked brain-wide electrical responses (Parabucki and Lampl 2017). As the somatosensory cortex receives sensory input from the phrenic nerve (Davenport and others 2010), movement of the torso during respiration may drive bilateral somatosensory activation, and slow modulation of respiration would cause corresponding slow variations in neural activity in the trunk and visceral representations in somatosensory cortex. The confounds of respiration on brain-wide BOLD signals (the so-called “global signal”) are well known (Birn and others 2008a; Birn and others 2008b; Birn and others 2009; Murphy and others 2013).…”
Section: Respiration and Sniffing Behaviors Are Modulated By Tasks Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This periphery unceasingly provides sensory information to the brain, which takes up its role in discriminative processing and affective processing of different types of stimuli, e.g., mechanical loads, bronchoconstriction, hyperinflation, and blood gas changes [ 3 , 4 ]. Although researchers do not fully understand all cortical and subcortical neural pathways involved in respiratory sensory processing, previous studies have provided evidence related to respiratory-related brain activations in both humans and animals [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. For example, a respiratory-related evoked potential (RREP) was recorded in lamb cortex [ 10 ], and phrenic nerve stimulation elicited an evoked potential in cat cerebral cortex [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RREP studies have suggested the cortical sources of the Nf peak are likely located at the frontal cortices, the sources for the P1 peak to be the somatosensory cortices, the sources for the N1 and P3 peaks to be the right lateral sensorimotor cortices and lateral parietal cortices, respectively (Davenport et al, 1996; Logie et al, 1998; Chan and Davenport, 2010; von Leupoldt et al, 2010). Although the RREP studies were unable to provide inferences for subcortical activation patterns in response to respiratory mechanical stimulus, previous animal studies have suggested that stimulation to the phrenic nerve and thalamus resulted in direct inputs to the 3a and 3b areas (Yates et al, 1994; Davenport et al, 2010). In the present study, we collected the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data for spatial localizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%