2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11581-8_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phrase-Final Lengthening in Russian: Pre-boundary or Pre-pausal?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Syllable level: Number of consonantal segments in tonic and posttonic syllables, grouped by Maximum Onset Principle; Consonant identity (manner of articulation) (Klatt, 1976); 4 Voicing of consonants preceding and following syllable nuclei (Chen, 1970); Nucleus identity (syllabic, or vowel class) (Klatt, 1976). 5 Word level: Number of syllables per word (Lehiste, 1976); Inflectional suffix (Yes/No) (Walsh & Parker, 1983); Grammatical category (Anttila et al, 2020); Lemma frequency, log-transformed (Bell et al, 2009) Utterance level : List intonation (Yes/No) (Calder et al, 2013) 6 ; Pre-pausal (Yes/No) (≥200 ms) (Campione & Véronis, 2002; Kachkovskaia, 2014); Articulation rate (syllables/phonation time) (Turk & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Syllable level: Number of consonantal segments in tonic and posttonic syllables, grouped by Maximum Onset Principle; Consonant identity (manner of articulation) (Klatt, 1976); 4 Voicing of consonants preceding and following syllable nuclei (Chen, 1970); Nucleus identity (syllabic, or vowel class) (Klatt, 1976). 5 Word level: Number of syllables per word (Lehiste, 1976); Inflectional suffix (Yes/No) (Walsh & Parker, 1983); Grammatical category (Anttila et al, 2020); Lemma frequency, log-transformed (Bell et al, 2009) Utterance level : List intonation (Yes/No) (Calder et al, 2013) 6 ; Pre-pausal (Yes/No) (≥200 ms) (Campione & Véronis, 2002; Kachkovskaia, 2014); Articulation rate (syllables/phonation time) (Turk & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utterance level : List intonation (Yes/No) (Calder et al, 2013) 6 ; Pre-pausal (Yes/No) (≥200 ms) (Campione & Véronis, 2002; Kachkovskaia, 2014); Articulation rate (syllables/phonation time) (Turk & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because kinematic articulatory constraints result in lengthened syllables before sentence or phrase boundaries, listeners may have learned to associate lengthening with boundaries and to exploit it as a cue for speech segmentation [ 131 ]. In turn, speakers may have started to intentionally use lengthening to indicate boundaries in the speech stream, also at positions where they did not pause [ 132 ]. Via cultural transmission, this may have resulted in final lengthening becoming a conventionalized but still language-universal boundary signal [ 133 ].…”
Section: Final Lengthening As a Cross-linguistic Segmentation Cuementioning
confidence: 99%