Photovoice Reveals Residents’ Concerns for Air and Water Quality in Industry-Impacted Rural Community

Abstract

Rural communities of color in the southeastern U.S. experience a high burden of environmental hazards from concentrated industry placement. Community-engaged research and qualitative methods can improve our understanding of meaning-making in a community impacted by polluting facilities. This study applies the photovoice method to assess how a predominantly African American community in rural North Carolina, impacted by a landfill and confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), perceives their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Two research questions were developed with community-based partners: (a) How do environmental health concerns in this community influence residents’ perceptions of their HRQoL? and (b) How do community and county factors facilitate or inhibit community organizing around these concerns? Three photo assignment sessions were held to engage participants in discussions related to the research questions. Researchers analyzed discussion audio recordings and identified themes related to concerns about the following issues: health and quality of life, the landfill industry’s influence on community cohesion and self-determination, and actions to address environmental injustice in Sampson County. Photovoice benefits community-engaged researchers by providing a process for assessing the research interests of a community. Photovoice also serves community organizers by providing residents with a structured way to discuss their lived experiences and strategize ways to reduce hazard exposure.

The Use of Appreciative Inquiries In Rural Communities

“…Rural communities in the United States are typically characterized as underserved, impoverished, with limited resources and an inability to address their residents' needs. Authors such as Butler et al [1], Crumb et al [2], Rimmler et al [3] and Tiruneh et al [4] emphasize rural challenges including mental health problems, inequality related to employment, illicit drug use, substance use, and limited resources and services. However, many authors talk about the strengths, resilience, and social capital in rural communities.…”