1994
DOI: 10.1021/bi00182a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phototransformation of Pea Phytochrome A Induces an Increase in .alpha.-Helical Folding of the Apoprotein: Comparison with a Monocot Phytochrome A and CD Analysis by Different Methods

Abstract: The photoreversible conformational change associated with the Pr-->Pfr transformation of a dicot phytochrome A (Pisum sativum, pea) has been probed by circular dichroism (CD) studies. Three different CD analysis methods have been used to determine the secondary structure of pea phytochrome A in both Pr and Pfr forms. We have shown that the secondary structure of dicot pea phytochrome A is very similar to the structure of monocot oat phytochrome A which was determined earlier [Sommer & Song (1990) Biochemistry … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable selection method (Manavalan & Johnson, 1987) is recommended only for data that go to at least 190 nm, with 184 nm being the preferred lower wavelength limit. Deforce et al (1994) showed that secondary structure predictions made for phytochrome using the method of Yang et al (1986) correlate well with results obtained using both the method of Manavalan and Johnson (1987) and convex constraint analysis as described by Perczel et al (1992). Truncation of the spectra at 200 nm resulted in deviations from the magnitude of each component from that previously reported.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The variable selection method (Manavalan & Johnson, 1987) is recommended only for data that go to at least 190 nm, with 184 nm being the preferred lower wavelength limit. Deforce et al (1994) showed that secondary structure predictions made for phytochrome using the method of Yang et al (1986) correlate well with results obtained using both the method of Manavalan and Johnson (1987) and convex constraint analysis as described by Perczel et al (1992). Truncation of the spectra at 200 nm resulted in deviations from the magnitude of each component from that previously reported.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…On Pr/Pfr phototransformation, the NTE region undergoes a conformational change from random coil to amphiphilic a-helix, which then interacts with the chromophore in the Pfr form (Parker et al, 1992;Deforce et al, 1994). Also, two Trp residues near the core regulatory region of oat phyA become preferentially exposed in the Pfr form (Wells et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytochromes are composed of several domains known as an N-terminal extension (amino acid residues 1-65) that undergoes conformational change upon phototransformation, an N-terminal chromophore lyase domain (1-407) for chromophore attachment, Per/Arnt/Sim (PAS)-related domains (611-870), and a histidine kinase-related domain (871-1192). [31][32][33] We initially constructed several phyA deletion mutants lacking the N or C terminus ( Figure 2A). Assembly of the full-length (1-1129), A957 (1-957), A407 (1-407), AD65 (66-1129), and AC (574-1129) constructs into holophytochromes was verified by Zn blot analysis ( Figure 2B), and the proteins showed the appropriate Pr/Pfr spectra of phyA (data not shown).…”
Section: Interaction Of Ndpk2 With Phytochromesmentioning
confidence: 99%