2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022jg007161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthetic Performance of Tidally Flooded Spartina Alterniflora Salt Marshes

Abstract: Tidal marshes are among the most productive ecosystems, and an important carbon (C) sink in the global carbon cycle (Bianchi, 2006). The average C burial rate of coastal salt marshes is as much as 1,713 g C m −2 yr −1 in sediment, ∼35 times higher than in terrestrial forests (McLeod et al., 2011), which provides the key scientific motivation to understand salt marsh productivity across space and time. Salt marshes experience periodic tidal flooding, which affects plant production (Hawman et al., 2021;O'Connell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Kathileankal et al (2008) found S. alterniflora photosynthetic rates declined under submerged conditions (> 25 cm) due to limited light availability, decreasing net ecosystem exchange by 46 %. Likewise, Mao et al (2023) found that photosynthetic efficiency was related to the proportion of submerged S. alterniflora leaves, but that fully submerged leaves actively photosynthesize. While our short-term S. alterniflora net ecosystem exchange rates measured during the peak of the growing season were comparable to Cornell et al's (2007) estimates, S. patens has a longer photosynthetic period during the growing season resulting in potentially greater annual carbon uptake (Artigas et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, Kathileankal et al (2008) found S. alterniflora photosynthetic rates declined under submerged conditions (> 25 cm) due to limited light availability, decreasing net ecosystem exchange by 46 %. Likewise, Mao et al (2023) found that photosynthetic efficiency was related to the proportion of submerged S. alterniflora leaves, but that fully submerged leaves actively photosynthesize. While our short-term S. alterniflora net ecosystem exchange rates measured during the peak of the growing season were comparable to Cornell et al's (2007) estimates, S. patens has a longer photosynthetic period during the growing season resulting in potentially greater annual carbon uptake (Artigas et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…accumulation of 13 C (Lin and da SL Sternberg, 1993; Essemine et al, Mao et al, 2023). When nutrient resources are limited, larger plants typically require a significant amount of nutrients to sustain rapid growth, resulting in a dilution of 15 N and a decrease in its accumulation within the plant (Hill et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spartina alterniflora, recognized as a typical invasive plant, is a perennial monocotyledonous plant belonging to the Poaceae family (Cheng et al, 2022;Jia et al, 2022). It possesses extensive roots and robust reproductive capabilities, commonly growing in the intertidal zones of estuaries, bays, coastal mudflats, and tidal-influenced beaches worldwide (Humphreys et al, 2021;Mao et al, 2023). S. alterniflora plays a significant role in ecological and economic benefits, including carbon and nitrogen fixation, wind and wave prevention, embankment and beach protection, soil improvement, and the expansion of animal and plant habitats (Lu et al, 2020;Meng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal marshes that are dominated by a single species, such as S. alterniflora in the Southeast US, have distinct zonation from tall dense canopies in low elevation areas along tidal creeks to short canopy interiors higher in the tidal frame (Pennings & Callaway, 1992). In these marshes, rates of photosynthesis can vary up to 2.6‐fold (Giurgevich & Dunn, 1979) across canopy height and significantly by inundation status (Kathilankal et al., 2008; Mao et al., 2023). Biomass and canopy leaf area vary by up to 5‐fold and 3‐fold, respectively (Hawman et al., 2023; Więski & Pennings, 2014), just a few meters apart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%