1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-328x(81)80159-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Some South African Parasitic Flowering Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both species retain rudimentary leaves and very low levels of chlorophyll despite having no net carbon gain under high light conditions (17,36). These observations suggest that these ''borderline'' holoparasitic lineages may be of relatively recent origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both species retain rudimentary leaves and very low levels of chlorophyll despite having no net carbon gain under high light conditions (17,36). These observations suggest that these ''borderline'' holoparasitic lineages may be of relatively recent origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this group are facul-tative as well as obligate parasites, hemiparasites of widely varying photosynthetic ability, and a diverse collection of fully heterotrophic holoparasites (1,2,(17)(18)(19). No other group of parasitic plants displays this continuum of parasitic abilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although precise quantification is limited by the extent of the model and a knowledge of contributions from respiration, export and import, we suggest that mature S. hermonthica and S. asiatica plants obtain about a third of their carbon from their host. This contrasts with the view held from earlier studies on Striga (2,3). This loss of host photosynthate, coupled with the pathogenic effect that Striga has on photosynthesis in sorghum (22), probably account for the massive growth reductions observed in sorghum parasitized by Striga ( 19,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 δ 13 C of mistletoe-C3 host pairs from New Zealand, Australia, Africa and Madagascar, and Brazil. The dashed line indicates 1:1 correspondence between mistletoe and host δ 13 C and the solid line the overall regression of mistletoe δ 13 C on host δ 13 C. Data for individual mistletoe-host pairs from Australia, Africa and Madgascar are from Ziegler (1995) and supplemented by African data from Richter et al (1995) and De la Harpe et al (1980, 1981, data from Brazil are from Lüttge et al (1998) When the formulae (Eqs. 1, 2) used by Marshall and Ehleringer (1990) are applied to the mean values for the ten mistletoe-host pairs in Table 2, the calculated mean level of heterotrophy is 79%.…”
Section: Water Relations Photosynthesis and Heterotrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, nitrogen content (Ehleringer et al 1986;Bannister 1989) and δ 15 N (Schulze et al 1991) of mistletoes and hosts are usually strongly correlated. De la Harpe et al (1980, 1981 measured δ 13 C in various holoparasitic and hemiparasitic plants (including mistletoes) and, in their 1981 paper, suggested that differences in δ 13 C between host and parasite might be related to the degree of heterotrophy of the parasite. Subsequently Marshall and Ehleringer (1990), using the methodology of Press et al (1987), calculated the degree of heterotrophy of a mistletoe by assuming that the difference between observed and calculated δ 13 C of mistletoe tissue was a function of heterotrophy, and that the δ 13 C of a fully heterotrophic mistletoe would be identical to its host.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%