1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-328x(80)80081-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthesis of Certain South African Parasitic Flowering Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although precise quantification is limited by the extent of the model and a knowledge of contributions from respiration, export and import, we suggest that mature S. hermonthica and S. asiatica plants obtain about a third of their carbon from their host. This contrasts with the view held from earlier studies on Striga (2,3). This loss of host photosynthate, coupled with the pathogenic effect that Striga has on photosynthesis in sorghum (22), probably account for the massive growth reductions observed in sorghum parasitized by Striga ( 19,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although precise quantification is limited by the extent of the model and a knowledge of contributions from respiration, export and import, we suggest that mature S. hermonthica and S. asiatica plants obtain about a third of their carbon from their host. This contrasts with the view held from earlier studies on Striga (2,3). This loss of host photosynthate, coupled with the pathogenic effect that Striga has on photosynthesis in sorghum (22), probably account for the massive growth reductions observed in sorghum parasitized by Striga ( 19,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…8 δ 13 C of mistletoe-C3 host pairs from New Zealand, Australia, Africa and Madagascar, and Brazil. The dashed line indicates 1:1 correspondence between mistletoe and host δ 13 C and the solid line the overall regression of mistletoe δ 13 C on host δ 13 C. Data for individual mistletoe-host pairs from Australia, Africa and Madgascar are from Ziegler (1995) and supplemented by African data from Richter et al (1995) and De la Harpe et al (1980, 1981, data from Brazil are from Lüttge et al (1998) When the formulae (Eqs. 1, 2) used by Marshall and Ehleringer (1990) are applied to the mean values for the ten mistletoe-host pairs in Table 2, the calculated mean level of heterotrophy is 79%.…”
Section: Water Relations Photosynthesis and Heterotrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, nitrogen content (Ehleringer et al 1986;Bannister 1989) and δ 15 N (Schulze et al 1991) of mistletoes and hosts are usually strongly correlated. De la Harpe et al (1980, 1981 measured δ 13 C in various holoparasitic and hemiparasitic plants (including mistletoes) and, in their 1981 paper, suggested that differences in δ 13 C between host and parasite might be related to the degree of heterotrophy of the parasite. Subsequently Marshall and Ehleringer (1990), using the methodology of Press et al (1987), calculated the degree of heterotrophy of a mistletoe by assuming that the difference between observed and calculated δ 13 C of mistletoe tissue was a function of heterotrophy, and that the δ 13 C of a fully heterotrophic mistletoe would be identical to its host.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep rooting system of the nurse tree (recorded to 60 m by Canadell et al (1996)) likely minimizes direct competition for water, and it is more that the subcanopy of A. erioloba is a focus for animal activity, than competition that makes the subcanopy environment hazardous. The protection from mistletoe infestation likely arises because the mistletoe V. rotundifolium found here has high photosynthate requirements (de la Harpe et al 1980), a type of indirect facilitation. Indirect facilitation usually occurs when the positive effect of one species on another, via moderation of a mutual competitor, is greater than the effect of direct competition (Levine 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%