1989
DOI: 10.1021/ic00305a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosubstitution in tris chelate complexes of ruthenium(II) containing the ligands 2,2'-bipyrazine, 2,2'-bipyrimidine, 2,2'-bipyridine, and 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine: energy gap control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For [Ru(bpy) 2 (py) 2 ] 2+ , the photoinduced ligand exchange of one py ligand with Cl – in CH 3 CN was reported to take place with Φ 436 = 0.0059, and the introduction of −CH 3 groups to produce [Ru(4,4′-Me 2 bpy) 2 (py) 2 ] 2+ (4,4′-Me 2 bpy = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) resulted in Φ 436 = 0.025 under similar experimental conditions. 49 The 4.2-fold increase in ligand exchange quantum yield is primarily a result of electronic effects from the electron-donating −CH 3 substituents. An electronic effect from the −CH 3 groups in 2 is expected, but the significantly larger Φ enhancement for 2 relative to 1 measured in the present work (>1600-fold; Table 1) indicates that the steric effects of the bulky NN ligand influence the photoreactivity to a much greater extent than electronic effects alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For [Ru(bpy) 2 (py) 2 ] 2+ , the photoinduced ligand exchange of one py ligand with Cl – in CH 3 CN was reported to take place with Φ 436 = 0.0059, and the introduction of −CH 3 groups to produce [Ru(4,4′-Me 2 bpy) 2 (py) 2 ] 2+ (4,4′-Me 2 bpy = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) resulted in Φ 436 = 0.025 under similar experimental conditions. 49 The 4.2-fold increase in ligand exchange quantum yield is primarily a result of electronic effects from the electron-donating −CH 3 substituents. An electronic effect from the −CH 3 groups in 2 is expected, but the significantly larger Φ enhancement for 2 relative to 1 measured in the present work (>1600-fold; Table 1) indicates that the steric effects of the bulky NN ligand influence the photoreactivity to a much greater extent than electronic effects alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the efficiency of the reaction measured for 2 is ∼4-fold greater than the Cl – ligand exchange reported for [Ru(tpy)(py) 3 ] 2+ and cis -[Ru(tpy)(py) 2 Cl] + (λ irr = 436 nm). 49,50 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter condition should hold provided that the energy of the 3 LF states are not so low that intersystem crossing back to the ground state becomes too rapid and competes with ligand dissociation in accordance with the energy gap law. 44,50 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoinduced ligand dissociation speaks for the prominent contribution of the ligand field. Although usually neglected, however, Ru(II)-polypyridyl complexes suffer slight photodecomposition when potentially coordinating counter-anions are present in solution [91][92][93][94]. This detrimental ligand dissociation [95] is ascribed to thermal population of the upper lying T 2 level (MC) from T 1 [54]; this is the reason why osmium-based analogues, featuring a ca.…”
Section: Coarse-and Fine-tuning Of Excited-state Properties Of Ru(ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%