The introduction of steric bulk to
the bidentate ligand in [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(py)]2+ (1; tpy = 2,2′:2′,6″-terpyridine;
bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; py = pyridine) to provide [Ru(tpy)(Me2bpy)(py)]2+ (2; Me2bpy
= 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) and [Ru(tpy)(biq)(py)]2+ (3; biq = 2,2′-biquinoline) facilitates
photoinduced dissociation of pyridine with visible light. Upon irradiation
of 2 and 3 in CH3CN (λirr = 500 nm), ligand exchange occurs to produce the corresponding
[Ru(tpy)(NN)(NCCH3)]2+ (NN = Me2bpy,
biq) complex with quantum yields, Φ500, of 0.16(1)
and 0.033(1) for 2 and 3, respectively.
These values represent an increase in efficiency of the reaction by
2–3 orders of magnitude as compared to that of 1, Φ500 < 0.0001, under similar experimental conditions.
The photolysis of 2 and 3 in H2O with low energy light to produce [Ru(tpy)(NN)(OH2)]2+ (NN = Me2bpy, biq) also proceeds rapidly (λirr > 590 nm). Complexes 1–3 are stable in the dark in both CH3CN and H2O under similar experimental conditions. X-ray crystal structures
and theoretical calculations highlight significant distortion of the
planes of the bidentate ligands in 2 and 3 relative to that of 1. The crystallographic dihedral
angles defined by the bidentate ligand, Me2bpy in 2 and biq in 3, and the tpy ligand were determined
to be 67.87° and 61.89°, respectively, whereas only a small
distortion from the octahedral geometry is observed between bpy and
tpy in 1, 83.34°. The steric bulk afforded by Me2bpy and biq also result in major distortions of the pyridine
ligand in 2 and 3, respectively, relative
to 1, which are believed to weaken its σ-bonding
and π-back-bonding to the metal and play a crucial role in the
efficiency of the photoinduced ligand exchange. The ability of 2 and 3 to undergo ligand exchange with λirr > 590 nm makes them potential candidates to build photochemotherapeutic
agents for the delivery of drugs with pyridine binding groups.