2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.436834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoresist outgassing at 157 nm exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5 these thickness changes are calculated as removal rates: the average rate is about 0.4 nm/kJ/cm 2 . This removal rate of 0.4 nm/kJ/cm 2 for FIB depositions is about an order of magnitude smaller than previously studied highly conjugated, "graphitized" polymer films with cleaning rates of 3nm/ (kJ/cm 2 ) / 1 ppm oxygen [2,3].…”
Section: Uv Lamp Cleaning (172nm 1% O 2 )mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 5 these thickness changes are calculated as removal rates: the average rate is about 0.4 nm/kJ/cm 2 . This removal rate of 0.4 nm/kJ/cm 2 for FIB depositions is about an order of magnitude smaller than previously studied highly conjugated, "graphitized" polymer films with cleaning rates of 3nm/ (kJ/cm 2 ) / 1 ppm oxygen [2,3].…”
Section: Uv Lamp Cleaning (172nm 1% O 2 )mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The reported cleaning rates are in the range of about 3nm / kJ/cm 2 / 1ppm O 2 [1,2] In the case of removing organic compounds from highly contaminant sensitive 157nm optical elements the cleaning effect is appreciated and explored [3,4,5] But there are also layers purposely deposited on mask surfaces which should not be impacted or even removed during these cleaning procedures: FIB-deposited carbon-containing films. These FIB depositions are state-of-the art for the repair of reticles [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In certain cases, the films of molecular contaminants formed on optical surfaces can be removed by cleaning them with appropriate solvents or by applying several cleaning techniques such as CO 2 snow cleaning, ion or laser cleaning, on-orbit exposure to ambient atomic oxygen, synchrotron radiation heating and VUV irradiation [36]. Exposure of contaminated surfaces at longer wavelengths is less efficient to clean due to lower photon energy and lower fragmentation probability than exposure at short wavelengths [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,[10][11][12][16][17][18][19][20] Many of these studies have focused on the outgassing (including photo-induced outgassing) of organic contaminants from photoresists. 10,12,[16][17][18] These organic contaminants reduce system transmittance by partially absorbing the light energy at the specific radiation wavelength by being in the beam path or adsorbed to the lens surface (see inset Figure 1). Basic (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%