2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoreflectance and contactless electroreflectance spectroscopy of GaAs-based structures: The below band gap oscillation features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, PR spectra for GaAs-based structures grown on n-type substrate usually exhibit a below-band-gap oscillation, which complicates or makes impossible the analysis of QW transitions and GaAsrelated signal. [27][28][29] CER spectra are free of the below-bandgap oscillation 28,29 due to different electromodulation mechanism and therefore this technique is excellent to study both the QW transitions and built-in electric field in the GaAs cap layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PR spectra for GaAs-based structures grown on n-type substrate usually exhibit a below-band-gap oscillation, which complicates or makes impossible the analysis of QW transitions and GaAsrelated signal. [27][28][29] CER spectra are free of the below-bandgap oscillation 28,29 due to different electromodulation mechanism and therefore this technique is excellent to study both the QW transitions and built-in electric field in the GaAs cap layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that the mechanism of electro−modulation is different for the two techniques. Thus, significant differences between CER and PR spectra can appear for some samples [60][61][62].…”
Section: Contactless Electroreflectance Vs Photo--reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…an oscillation feature (OF) appear in PR spectra below the energy gap of GaAs if they are grown on n−type GaAs substrates [53,60,68,69]. Sometimes a weak OF is also observed for structures grown on semin− sulating GaAs substrates [61]. In general such an OF is an unwanted signal which complicates the analysis of optical transitions in QWs and/or QDs.…”
Section: Contactless Electroreflectance Vs Photo--reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their influence has been observed previously in a form of the socalled below band gap oscillations, i.e., an interference effect related to the modulation of the refractive index difference between two parts of the structure ͑e.g., doped substrate and undoped buffer͒. 13,14 In the case of a quantum dot structure the properties of these nanometer scale objects can be much easier modified due to loading them with charge carriers. In general, the possible modulating factors which may contribute to the QD photoreflectance signal can be divided into two groups: ͑i͒ photoinduced electromodulation of the built-in electric fields and hence modulating the QD optical transitions due to quantum confined Stark effect ͑this factor is assumed to be the dominating one for most of quantum well structures͒; ͑ii͒ modulation of the dot properties due to the appearance of carriers in the QD layer, e.g., self-consistent modification of the confinement potential, many-body effects important at higher carrier concentrations, changes in the dot material refractive index, effect of filling the dot states of a whole inhomogeneous QD ensemble according to the Boltzman distribution, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%