2000
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.17.000568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoreceptor distribution in the retinas of subprimate mammals

Abstract: Relevant data on the distribution of color cones are summarized, with special emphasis on the marked dorsoventral asymmetries observed in a number of mammalian species. In addition, an overview is given of studies that demonstrate the coexistence of two visual pigments within the same cone cell. The biological significance of these phenomena is discussed in conjunction with comparative immunocytochemical analyses of subprimate retinas. Based on various cone distribution patterns and temporal and spatial visual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, embryonic and early postnatal rabbit and mouse retinal transplants develop a high ratio of S to M cones (reviewed in ref. 17). A thyroid hormone receptor is required for M cone development in mice, and animals lacking Thrb develop only S (UV) cones (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, embryonic and early postnatal rabbit and mouse retinal transplants develop a high ratio of S to M cones (reviewed in ref. 17). A thyroid hormone receptor is required for M cone development in mice, and animals lacking Thrb develop only S (UV) cones (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retinal pathology underlying the ESCS phenotype is not known. Noninvasive measurement of photoreceptor physiology (16) and the recent molecular association (9) have led to speculation that an NR2E3 mutant retina could resemble transplants and explants of rabbit and rodent retinas, which develop a high S to M cone ratio (17). Mutant NR2E3 may result in disordered retinal cell-fate determination, with overproduction of S cones at the expense of other photoreceptor types (9,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That these cells follow the dual opsin gradient supports the hypothesis that the opsin gradients optimize contrast detection across spectral variation along the vertical meridian. Although the ecological basis for this optimization presumably lies in the spectral shift between ground and sky (Szél et al, 2000;Osorio and Vorobyev, 2005), a detailed account awaits a fuller characterization of the guinea pig's photic environment and the signal-to-noise properties of its photoreceptors. Recent work has begun to characterize noise sources in the photoreceptors of various species and how these vary between rods and cones Figure 6.…”
Section: Opsin Expression Predicts Cone Input To Horizontal and Briskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in certain rodents, such as guinea pig, rabbit, and mouse, immunostaining shows a dual gradient: cones expressing M opsin peak in superior retina and decline inferiorly; whereas cones expressing S opsin peak in inferior retina and decline superiorly (Röhlich et al, 1994;Applebury et al, 2000;Haverkamp et al, 2005;Nikonov et al, 2005). This dual gradient in animals that scurry along the ground might be an evolutionary adaptation to detect objects against different spectral backgrounds, such as ground vegetation (seen by superior retina) and sky (seen by inferior retina) (Szél et al, 2000;Osorio and Vorobyev, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, only circumstantial evidence for the existence of blue-cone bipolar cells in mammals other than primates has been presented [rabbit (Famiglietti, 1981), cat (Cohen and Sterling, 1990), rat (Euler and Wässle, 1995), and mouse (Ghosh et al, 2004;Pignatelli and Strettoi, 2004)]. Because S-cones show very specific distributions across the retina in different mammals, such as the S-cone-rich area in the ventral retina of mice and rabbits, one also has to ask how an S-cone-selective channel has adapted to such variations (Szél et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%