1968
DOI: 10.1021/jo01275a025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photorearrangements of 2,4-disubstituted phenyl esters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend is consistent with other reports in which it has been shown that decarboxylation increases with ortho substitution and the imposition of a conformation similar to that of the transition state. 10, 22 The 4/5 ratios are equal to k 4 /k 5 , the ratios of the rate constants for the addition of an acyl radical to the 2-and 4-positions of the aryloxy radical. Like the ratio of decarboxylation to rearrangement products, it is also sensitive to increasing phenyl substitution on the methyl groups of the o-cresyl acylates-it increases from 2.4 for 1a to 11.0 for 1c-but probably for very different reasons: the ratios of decarboxylation to rearrangement products depend on reaction pathways of the excited singlet states of the esters, themselves, whereas the 4/5 ratios involve factors related to the motions of the radical pairs that emanate from lyses of the excited singlet states.…”
Section: Irradiations In Cyclohexanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend is consistent with other reports in which it has been shown that decarboxylation increases with ortho substitution and the imposition of a conformation similar to that of the transition state. 10, 22 The 4/5 ratios are equal to k 4 /k 5 , the ratios of the rate constants for the addition of an acyl radical to the 2-and 4-positions of the aryloxy radical. Like the ratio of decarboxylation to rearrangement products, it is also sensitive to increasing phenyl substitution on the methyl groups of the o-cresyl acylates-it increases from 2.4 for 1a to 11.0 for 1c-but probably for very different reasons: the ratios of decarboxylation to rearrangement products depend on reaction pathways of the excited singlet states of the esters, themselves, whereas the 4/5 ratios involve factors related to the motions of the radical pairs that emanate from lyses of the excited singlet states.…”
Section: Irradiations In Cyclohexanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although efficient loss of carbon dioxide has been observed for a dihydro-santonin3 and for simple 7-butyrolactones in the vapor phase,4 carbon dioxide loss is ordinarily a minor pathway in the solution photochemistry of lactones5 and esters. 6 The model compounds chosen for study are shown in Scheme I.9 Qualitative and quantitative results of photolysis of the model compounds are shown in Table I and Scheme I.10 For all 7-phenyl-7-butyrolactones studied, the efficiency of carbon dioxide loss is good, with 5 = 0.03-0.18. However, in contrast to 7-phenyl-7-butyrolactone (la) ( 00, = 0.020), the a-and ß-phenyl isomers decarboxylate very inefficiently ( , < 0.001) indicating that efficient carbon dioxide loss requires phenyl substitution at the 7 position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 The photochemistry of 2,4-disubstituted phenyl esters has been studied previously, and the photo-Fries rearrangement, cleavage and decarboxylation, as well as methoxy migration, are all known to occur with these substrates. 25 Curiously, practically no detailed study has been done on the photolysis of highly substituted aryl esters. However, our substrates, orthoand/or para-blocked aryl alkanoates 1 and 2, are most suitable for sorting out the complicated competing reaction paths and mechanisms, since the ortho-and para-substituents formally prevent the photo-Fries rearrangement, but yet allow the 'semi"-rearrangement to the transient cyclohexadienone species.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Decarboxylation and Fries Rearrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the same procedure as above, 1d was synthesized from 60% NaH (0.70 g, 18 mmol), mesitol (2.1 g, 15 mmol) and cyclopropanecarbonyl chloride (1.4 mL, 16 mmol) 12.87, 16.30, 20.88, 129.28, 129.91, 135.24, 145.97 and 172.79; m/z (EI) 204 (M ϩ , 48%), 136 (58), 121 1(4), 91 (13), 69 (100) and 41 (25).…”
Section: Mesityl Cyclopropanecarboxylate 1dmentioning
confidence: 99%