The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology of Mercury 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781118146644.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoreactions of Mercury in Aquatic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reaction for LIW can perfectly fit the model of a first order reaction and the rate constants were 1.3 × 10 −6 s −1 for LIW 1μm and 2.2 × 10 −6 s −1 for LIW unfiltered . These gross values are comparable to dark (or low light) gross values from incubations for the Baltic Sea (1.5 AE 0.5 × 10 −6 s −1 ) (Kuss et al 2015) and Chesapeake Bay and coastal shelf waters (0.67-1.8 × 10 −6 s −1 ) (Whalin et al 2007), but rate constants of microbial production can be one to two orders of magnitude lower than those attributable to photochemical transformation at the ocean surface (O'Driscoll et al 2006;Whalin et al 2007;Qureshi et al 2009;Vost et al 2012).…”
Section: Lee and Fishersupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reaction for LIW can perfectly fit the model of a first order reaction and the rate constants were 1.3 × 10 −6 s −1 for LIW 1μm and 2.2 × 10 −6 s −1 for LIW unfiltered . These gross values are comparable to dark (or low light) gross values from incubations for the Baltic Sea (1.5 AE 0.5 × 10 −6 s −1 ) (Kuss et al 2015) and Chesapeake Bay and coastal shelf waters (0.67-1.8 × 10 −6 s −1 ) (Whalin et al 2007), but rate constants of microbial production can be one to two orders of magnitude lower than those attributable to photochemical transformation at the ocean surface (O'Driscoll et al 2006;Whalin et al 2007;Qureshi et al 2009;Vost et al 2012).…”
Section: Lee and Fishersupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Hg 0 formation in the surface mixed layer can involve a variety of complex abiotic and biotic processes. Abiotic processes such as photochemical reduction of Hg(II) has been shown to produce Hg 0 , where solar radiation (visible and ultraviolet), dissolved organic matter, and inorganic free radicals are considered key factors involved in the photochemical formation of Hg 0 from Hg(II) (Nriagu ; Amyot et al ; Costa and Liss , ; Vost et al ). In addition, photodegradation of MeHg can also produce Hg 0 (Suda et al ; Sellers et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Our results show that high DOC in seawaters favored the Hg(II) photoreduction (SI Figure S6) and decreased the Hg(0) photo-oxidation (SI Figure S9). This finding is consistent with the study of Costa and Liss, 8 who observed that seawaters spiked with humic acid had enhanced Hg(II) reduction rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…4−35 Therefore, a wide range of rate constants of Hg(II) reduction and Hg(0) oxidation have been reported. 36 As a key component of the regional and global Hg research framework, model study is an important tool for understanding the global Hg cycle. 1,3 One of the most important knowledge gaps of current Hg model study is the lack of representative and comprehensive kinetic data of Hg redox reactions in seawaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elemental mercury can then volatilize to the atmosphere, thereby decreasing the levels of mercury in the ocean (Andersson et al, 2011;Ci et al, 2011;Soerensen et al, 2013). This process is facilitated by wind and surface layer disturbances (O 'Driscoll et al, 2003a, b;Orihel et al, 2007;Vost et al, 2012). Reduction of mercury can be both photochemical (Amyot et al, 1994Zhang and Lindberg, 2001) and biotic (Mason et al, 1995;Siciliano et al, 2002).…”
Section: Mercury Reduction and Oxidation Processes In The Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%