1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf02724342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoreactions above the giant dipole resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 213 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the calculations do have some differences. Foremost among these is the description used for the electric transition operator, defined [29] for a photon with moment, um q and polarization A as V x (jl.(qr)YII. i, (r)) .…”
Section: Differences In Bpa Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the calculations do have some differences. Foremost among these is the description used for the electric transition operator, defined [29] for a photon with moment, um q and polarization A as V x (jl.(qr)YII. i, (r)) .…”
Section: Differences In Bpa Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6.9), namely κ = 0.35 ± 0.10 (see, e.g., Ref. [91]). For the OBEPR(B) version of the Bonn potential the difference would be even bigger since then κ is predicted to be equal to κ = 0.50.…”
Section: B Two-body Seagull Amplitude: Low-energy Behaviormentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(11), usually neglected in the study of photo-nuclear reactions [24,25,49,52]. The ratios between the transverse responses, Eq.…”
Section: The Electromagnetic Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed derivations of these expressions can be found in review articles [24] and books [25,26]. We work in natural units (h -= c = 1, e 2 = 1/137.04) and employ the conventions of Bjorken and Drell [27].…”
Section: The Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%