1990
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(90)90356-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photopolymers exhibiting a large difference between glass transition and curing temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…higher than T cure . 35 Similarly, Kloosterboer and Lijten 36 found the difference between the T g (tan For the sample cured at 23ЊC, the modulus and tan d curves appear to show two glass transitions d) and T cure to be 70ЊC for a diacrylate network.…”
Section: May Bementioning
confidence: 91%
“…higher than T cure . 35 Similarly, Kloosterboer and Lijten 36 found the difference between the T g (tan For the sample cured at 23ЊC, the modulus and tan d curves appear to show two glass transitions d) and T cure to be 70ЊC for a diacrylate network.…”
Section: May Bementioning
confidence: 91%
“…In light of this, one would expect that even in a vitrified system increases in photoinitiator would cause increases in reaction conversion. A study has been reported that suggests vitrification favors recombination of primary radicals and, as a result, reduces the efficiency of a photoinitiator 10) . Under this set of circumstances, it is highly unlikely that small changes in photoinitiator concentration (like 2.0% to 4.0%) will cause the necessary increase in radical concentration to effect reaction propagation in our systems.…”
Section: Two Level Factorial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitrification causes the mobility of unreacted polymer chains to be significantly reduced and it has been reported that reaction rates decrease to a level that is 1% of the maximum rate 10) . Even in vitrified systems, it is widely accepted that unreacted monomer/photoinitiator is capable of diffusing through the system causing further reaction conversion and transport of reactive sites by means of hydrogen abstractions 10) . In light of this, one would expect that even in a vitrified system increases in photoinitiator would cause increases in reaction conversion.…”
Section: Two Level Factorial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have pointed out that DSC technique monitors the polymerization rate rather than conversion and this method fail for conversion measurements in the case of very slow processes [21]. This fact can explain the broken correlation between fluorescence and DSC conversions at the final stage of polymerization as follows.…”
Section: Fluorescence Monitoring Of Multifunctional (Meth)acrylates Pmentioning
confidence: 99%