Photoplethysmography wave morphology in patients with atrial fibrillation

Basza, Mikołaj; Waląg, Damian; Kowalczyk, Weronika; Bozym, A B; Ciurla, M C; Krzyżanowska, Małgorzata; Maciejewski, Cezary; Bojanowicz, Wojciech; Soliński, Mateusz; Kołtowski, Łukasz

doi:10.1088/1361-6579/acc725

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides IBIs, CAs also distort the morphology of individual PPG pulses. Such information can be extracted by pulse wave analysis (PWA) (Proença et al 2019) to improve the detection of CAs (Jeanningros et al 2022, Basza et al 2023. However, both IBIs and PWA rely on an accurate detection of heartbeats in the PPG signal.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of cardiac arrhythmias on the detection of heartbeats in the photoplethysmogram: benchmarking open-source algorithms

Jeanningros,

Le Bloa,

Teres

et al. 2024

Physiol. Meas.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cardiac arrhythmias are a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Wearable devices based on photoplethysmography give the opportunity to screen large populations, hence allowing for an earlier detection of pathological rhythms that might reduce the risks of complications and medical costs. While most of beat detection algorithms have been evaluated on normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation recordings, the performance of these algorithms in patients with other cardiac arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia or bigeminy, remain unknown to date. The PPG-beats open-source framework, developed by Charlton and colleagues, evaluates the performance of the beat detectors named QPPG, MSPTD and ABD among others. We applied the PPG-beats framework on two newly acquired datasets, one containing seven different types of cardiac arrhythmia in hospital settings, and another dataset including two cardiac arrhythmias in ambulatory settings.In a clinical setting, the QPPG beat detector performed best on atrial fibrillation (with a median F1 score of 94.4%), atrial flutter (95.2%), atrial tachycardia (87.0%), sinus rhythm (97.7%), ventricular tachycardia (83.9%) and was ranked 2nd for bigeminy (75.7%) behind ABD detector (76.1%). In an ambulatory setting, the MSPTD beat detector performed best on normal sinus rhythm (94.6%), and the QPPG detector on atrial fibrillation (91.6%) and bigeminy (80.0%).Overall, the PPG beat detectors QPPG, MSPTD and ABD consistently stand out from other detectors with high performances. However, the detection of beats from wrist-PPG signals is compromised in presence of bigeminy or ventricular tachycardia.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%