2015
DOI: 10.1021/cg501792m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photophysical Property of catena-Bis(thiocyanato)aurate(I) Complexes in Ionic Liquids

Abstract: The photochemistry of a gold(I) thiocyanate complex has been investigated to determine the coordination structure in both the solid and liquid states. The coordination geometries of the supramolecular [Au(SCN) 2 ] n complex and the concomitant exciplex have mainly been analyzed by crystallographic analysis and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The Au−S bond distance and Au···Au separation of the compound in the S 0 ground state and in the T 1 phosphorescent excited state (λ ex = 340 nm) were compared. Upon irradi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar luminescence behavior of gold compounds has been previously reported in the literature, for instance, for the compounds as [Au(epdtc)] 2 , [Au(mpdtc)] 2 , [C 2 mim][Au(SCN) 2 ], Au 2 (NHC–(CH 2 ) n –NHC) 2 Br 2 [epdtc = ethyl(pyridine‐4‐ylmethyl)dithiocarbamate, mpdtc = methyl(2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethyl)dithiocarbamate, C 2 mim = 1‐alkyl‐3‐methylimidazolium], and was assigned to aurophilic interactions in these compounds , . Although the aurophilic interaction is involved as a source of the emission process, the luminescence energy cannot be correlated a priori with the Au I –Au I separations, because the (resultant) luminescence additionally depends on structural features (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar luminescence behavior of gold compounds has been previously reported in the literature, for instance, for the compounds as [Au(epdtc)] 2 , [Au(mpdtc)] 2 , [C 2 mim][Au(SCN) 2 ], Au 2 (NHC–(CH 2 ) n –NHC) 2 Br 2 [epdtc = ethyl(pyridine‐4‐ylmethyl)dithiocarbamate, mpdtc = methyl(2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethyl)dithiocarbamate, C 2 mim = 1‐alkyl‐3‐methylimidazolium], and was assigned to aurophilic interactions in these compounds , . Although the aurophilic interaction is involved as a source of the emission process, the luminescence energy cannot be correlated a priori with the Au I –Au I separations, because the (resultant) luminescence additionally depends on structural features (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This luminescent behavior can be assigned to aurophilic interactions. Similar luminescence behavior for Au I compounds was already reported in the literature, for instance, for the compounds [Au(epdtc)] 2 , [56] [ [56] [C2mim][Au(SCN) 2 ], [76] Au 2 (NHC-(CH 2 ) 3 -NHC) 2 (PF 6 ) 2 [77] (Au•••Au: 3.189 Å; λ em,max = 21187 cm -1 ) Au 2 (NHC-(CH 2 ) 3 -NHC) 2 Br 2 [77] (Au•••Au: 3.132 Å; λ em,max = 22728 cm -1 ) [epdtc = ethyl(pyridine-4-ylmethyl)dithiocarbamate, mpdtc = methyl(2-(pyridin-2-yl)ethyl)dithiocarbamate, C 2 mim = 1alkyl-3-methylimidazolium]. As already mentioned in the in-troduction, it seems likely that with increasing Au-Au distances the emission energy declines and vice versa.…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In particular, in the past decade, researchers have made headway in fabricating luminescent metal‐containing ILs by choosing appropriate metal centers for the [ MX n ] y − anions. To date, the most commonly used M centers have been f ‐block (lanthanides) and transition metal elements (e.g., Mn 2+ , Ru 2+ , Cu + , Ag + , Au + , and Pt 2+[12] ). In contrast, luminescent ILs containing main‐group metal ions have scarcely been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%