2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7nj00055c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photophysical properties of a series of cycloplatinated(ii) complexes featuring allyldiphenylphosphane

Abstract: Cycloplatinated(ii) complexes 1–4 were synthesized and characterized. All complexes exhibit strong luminescence except 3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coupling constants of 1 J PtP = 2162 Hz ( 1 ), 1937 Hz ( 2 ) and 2052 Hz ( 3 ) are typical for the P‐ trans ‐C (sp 2 ) geometry . It is noteworthy that this significant difference in the coupling values of 1 J PtP (about 120 Hz), is attributed to the trans influence of coordinated carbon atom of the C^N‐cyclometalated ligands (Obpy > bzq > ppy) . The 195 Pt{ 1 H} NMR spectra of these complexes contain a doublet resonance with a coupling constant value that is almost equal to that observed in the corresponding 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The coupling constants of 1 J PtP = 2162 Hz ( 1 ), 1937 Hz ( 2 ) and 2052 Hz ( 3 ) are typical for the P‐ trans ‐C (sp 2 ) geometry . It is noteworthy that this significant difference in the coupling values of 1 J PtP (about 120 Hz), is attributed to the trans influence of coordinated carbon atom of the C^N‐cyclometalated ligands (Obpy > bzq > ppy) . The 195 Pt{ 1 H} NMR spectra of these complexes contain a doublet resonance with a coupling constant value that is almost equal to that observed in the corresponding 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As depicted by perspective ORTEP view of the structures (Figure ), the allyl substituents of the PPh 2 allyl phosphane ligands are obviously detected to be perpendicular to the molecule plane in each structure. The distances between Pt(II) and the PPh 2 allyl moieties (Pt1‐P1=2.241(2) Å and Pt1‐P2=2.238(3) Å) in A , (Pt1A‐P1A=2.2980(4) Å and Pt1B‐P1B 2.3129(4) Å) in 1 a , or (Pt1‐P1=2.3015(6) Å) in 1 b and (Pt1‐P1=2.3031(5) Å) in 1 c , are in the same range as those found in similar Pt(II)‐phosphane complexes . The distances of the Pt−S bonds are almost equal in 1 a – c (∼2.33 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distances between Pt(II) and the PPh 2 allyl moieties (Pt1-P1 = 2.241(2) Å and Pt1-P2 = 2.238(3) Å) in A, (Pt1A-P1A = 2.2980(4) Å and Pt1B-P1B 2.3129(4) Å) in 1 a, or (Pt1-P1 = 2.3015(6) Å) in 1 b and (Pt1-P1 = 2.3031(5) Å) in 1 c, are in the same range as those found in similar Pt(II)-phosphane complexes. [23] The distances of the PtÀ S bonds are almost equal in 1 a-c (~2.33 Å). It is notable that the pyridyl moiety in the k 1 -S-SR ligand is approximately perpendicular to the metal plane.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another discrete signal assignable to the H 3 proton of O‐bpy appears as a sharp doublet signal. This signal is considerably deshielded to near 10 ppm due to being directly in contact through space with oxygen atom of the O‐bpy …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%