1922
DOI: 10.1126/science.55.1431.582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoperiodism, the Response of the Plant to Relative Length of Day and Night

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
121
1
5

Year Published

1936
1936
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
121
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-day conditions delay the flowering time by increasing the number of days to flowering. These results were confirmed previously by Garner and Allard (1923) and by Folliard et al (2004) who proved that for sorghum crop, progress towards flowering is accelerated when day-length decreases. On the basis of these outcomes we suggested that the exacted photoperiod compulsory for sorghum flowering belongs to the interval of 11-12 h of photoperiod.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Long-day conditions delay the flowering time by increasing the number of days to flowering. These results were confirmed previously by Garner and Allard (1923) and by Folliard et al (2004) who proved that for sorghum crop, progress towards flowering is accelerated when day-length decreases. On the basis of these outcomes we suggested that the exacted photoperiod compulsory for sorghum flowering belongs to the interval of 11-12 h of photoperiod.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Despite extensive analysis of the day-length control of flowering in sorghum, little is known regarding effect of variation in photoperiod or day-length on flowering time of sorghum (Menz et al 2002). Since sorghum was recognized as short-day species by Garner and Allard (1923), photoperiod sensitivity in this species has been systematically eliminated by breeders to enlarge the range of adaptability and to extend its cropping area to temperate environment (Chanterau et al 2001). A better understanding of response and sensitivity of flowering time in sorghum to the photoperiod will facilitate the control of flowering time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among traits in the maladaptive syndrome, flowering is the most important because it impacts the timing of seed production in relation to climate. The phenomena referred to as photoperiodism (first mentioned in Garner and Allard, 1923) describes plant responses, including flowering time, to the length of the period of daily light or photoperiod. A plant's transition from vegetative to reproductive phase can be sensitive to photoperiod, and the level of sensitivity measured in terms of flowering time can vary substantially among different genotypes within a species (for example, Quinby, 1967;Yano et al, 2001;Gouesnard et al, 2002), resulting at one extreme in delayed flowering or failure to flower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many plants and animals living at latitudes above the equator often alter their behaviour or developmental programmes in response to environmental signals such as day length or temperature (Hastings & Follet 2001). The role of day length, or photoperiod, in controlling seasonal responses was originally proposed by Tournois (1912) and Klebs (1913) at the beginning of the twentieth century, but Garner & Allard (1920, 1923 were the first to show clearly that flowering and other developmental responses could be controlled by exposure to long days (LDs) or short days (SDs) depending on the plant species. They demonstrated that the duration, rather than the quantity, of light in the daily cycle was a major factor in regulating plant development and introduced the term photoperiodism, which is defined as the response to the length of the day that enables living organisms to adapt to seasonal changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%