2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoperiod modifies thermal reaction norms for growth and development in the red poplar leaf beetle Chrysomela populi (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
20
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) and in the red poplar leaf beetle Ch. populi [17,18]. We also found a gradual decline in the degree of temperature-dependence of development with decreasing day-length analyzing some previous works [17], specifically in the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes [44], bugs Graphosoma lineatum [8] and Palomena prasina [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) and in the red poplar leaf beetle Ch. populi [17,18]. We also found a gradual decline in the degree of temperature-dependence of development with decreasing day-length analyzing some previous works [17], specifically in the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes [44], bugs Graphosoma lineatum [8] and Palomena prasina [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The pattern of the photoperiodic modification of thermal reaction norms in A. communis is entirely different from what we found in the linden bug Pyrrhocoris apterus and the red poplar leaf beetle Chrysomela populi [17,18]. In the latter cases, short-day conditions promoted a decrease both in the regression coefficient and in threshold, i.e., the larval development became more temperature-dependent as compared to the long-day group (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this pattern is consistent with the observed overall decrease in beetle body size over time, it suggests that increased temperature does not categorically result in smaller beetle body sizes. These data provide indirect support for laboratory studies demonstrating that the effect of temperature on insect body size can be dependent on photoperiod (Kutcherov, ; Kutcherov, Lopatina, & Kipyatkov, ; Xi, Wu, Nylin, & Sun, ). Additionally, if increased spring temperature (but not increased autumn temperature) is associated with an elevated availability of resources, these beetle data would support the Supply‐Demand (SD) model of the temperature–size rule (DeLong, ), which posits that variability in resource availability can mediate the effect of temperature on ectotherm body size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…, Kutcherov et al. ), and will determine the importance of this mechanism in shaping the phenology of a given species. A possible, testable prediction from our results is that species with particularly strong photoperiodic regulation of development rate should show smaller shifts in their phenologies (e.g., voltinism or flight dates) in response to short‐term temporal variation in climate, than would species with little or no such larval photoperiodism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%