1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.46.1973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photonic parton distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

14
710
3
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(735 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
14
710
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another source of differences is in the choice and scope of experimental data from which F γ 2 is extracted. At present there is an appreciable number of photon parton distribution sets available, both at leading and next-to-leading orders [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. It should be noted that unlike in the case of a nucleon, there are no valence quarks present in the photon; therefore antiquark distributions are the same as quark distributions.…”
Section: Parton Distributions In Nuclei and Photonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another source of differences is in the choice and scope of experimental data from which F γ 2 is extracted. At present there is an appreciable number of photon parton distribution sets available, both at leading and next-to-leading orders [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. It should be noted that unlike in the case of a nucleon, there are no valence quarks present in the photon; therefore antiquark distributions are the same as quark distributions.…”
Section: Parton Distributions In Nuclei and Photonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for this will become clear when we present results for the resolved component in heavy quark production. Two sets are relatively older and have been in common use: the Gluck-Reya-Vogt (GRV) set [61] and that by Schuler and Sjostrand (SaS1d) [65]. The third set, the CornetJankowski-Krawczyck (CJK2) set [69], is more recent and has facility to estimate error on a calculated quantity due to the uncertainties in the input photon parton distributions.…”
Section: Parton Distributions In Nuclei and Photonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the unpolarized case, a phenomenologically very successful prediction for the unpolarized photon structure functions f γ has emerged within the radiative parton model, where [29] a VMD valence-like structure at a low resolution scale µ was imposed as the input boundary condition, assuming that at this scale the photon entirely behaves like a vector meson, i.e., that its parton content is proportional to that of the ρ-meson. Since nothing is known experimentally about the latter, the parton densities of the neutral pion as determined in a previous study [30] were used instead which are expected not to be too dissimilar from those of the ρ.…”
Section: Polarized Parton Distributions Of the Proton And The Photonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as in [6]. If not stated otherwhise the hard scale in the calculation of the cross-section µ is taken to be the transverse mass of the produced heavy quark…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We test the sensitivity of considered processes to the gluonic content of the photon by using two different parton density parametrizations for the real photon: GRV [6] and SaS1d [7]. Both these parametrizations were extracted from QCD fits to photon structure function data measured in eγ collisions from e + e − interactions, but have different assumptions for the gluon content, which is only weakly constrained by these measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%