2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1765734
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photonic crystals through holographic lithography: Simple cubic, diamond-like, and gyroid-like structures

Abstract: We show how to fabricate three basic photonic crystal structures with simple cubic, fcc, and bcc translational symmetry by interference lithography. The structures are fabricable by the interference of beams launched from the same half space. The simple cubic structure is size scalable while the structure with fcc translational symmetry possesses two band gaps. Both these structures are experimentally realized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
168
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
168
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their limited depth of focus, however, makes it challenging to fabricate directly the types of 3D nanostructures that are important for many areas of nanotechnology. New methods based on colloidal sedimentation (4-10), polymer phase separation (11)(12)(13)(14)(15), templated growth (16)(17)(18), fluidic self-assembly (19,20), multiple beam interference lithography (21)(22)(23)(24), and various approaches based on printing, molding, and writing (1,3,25,26) are all useful for building different classes of 3D nanostructures. Nevertheless, each has limitations in the geometries and sizes of patterns that it can form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their limited depth of focus, however, makes it challenging to fabricate directly the types of 3D nanostructures that are important for many areas of nanotechnology. New methods based on colloidal sedimentation (4-10), polymer phase separation (11)(12)(13)(14)(15), templated growth (16)(17)(18), fluidic self-assembly (19,20), multiple beam interference lithography (21)(22)(23)(24), and various approaches based on printing, molding, and writing (1,3,25,26) are all useful for building different classes of 3D nanostructures. Nevertheless, each has limitations in the geometries and sizes of patterns that it can form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For certain large area applications, simpler techniques could be more suitable. Spontaneous self-assembly of colloids [375], synthetic opals [379][380][381][382][383][384], inverted opals [379,[385][386][387] and block copolymers [218,219,221,378,[388][389][390][391][392][393][394][395][396][397][398][399][400][401][402], on the other hand, allows the preparation of small enough structures. Although self-assembly leads to a well-defined local order and offers a potentially low-cost method for the production of photonic crystals, it is nontrivial to achieve perfectly ordered structures over the macroscopic length scale combining carefully engineered defects.…”
Section: Optical Properties Of Self-assembled Polymer Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the simple cubic P (Pm3m) structure can be sizescalable via triple exposures of a two-beam interference pattern, where the angle between the beams of the individual gratings can be varied. 20 This primitive structure shows a relatively wide and full PBG with a maximum gap to mid-gap ratio of 13% between 5th and 6th bands for a dielectric contrast of 13:1 and a volume fraction of 0.26. 21 Moreover, the pseudo gaps along the (100) direction (X-gap) in the simple cubic structure are very wide and appeared over a large range of filling ratios.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum PBG is found at t 1 = 0.83 -0.85 with n d = 3.50, and the corresponding volume fraction is 0.25 -0.26, which agrees well with the results from literature. 20 Then, we optimize t 2 to maximize the complete bandgap width while keeping the t 1 fixed (i.e., core-shell structure). For t 1 ranging from 0.65 to 0.90, the maximum PBG is obtained at t 2 = 2.5 -2.7, which is smaller than t 2 = 3.0 required for a completely filled simple cubic structure (see Fig 2(a)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation