Photoneutron Cross Sections for Ag¹⁰⁷, Mo⁹² and Zr⁹⁰

Theoretical Photoneutron Cross Sections and the Effect of Gamma Strength Functions for W, Ag, Nb

“…The effects of the gamma strength function on the cross section exchange data have determined the most compatible type of model. The results, especially for 107 Ag and 186 W, are in good agreement with the experimental data [25][26][27] from the EXFOR [17] database. The theoretical cross sections of reactions, obtained using the TALYS 1.6 models, clearly demonstrate the GDR effect.…”

“…The calculated results are compared with experimentally measured data [25][26][27], taken from EXFOR [21] In the calculations, all of the gamma strength functions of Kopecky-Uhl generalized Lorentzian, Brink-Axel Lorentzian, Hartree-Fock BCS tables, Hartree-FockBogolyubov tables and Goriely's hybrid model have been used. The effects of the gamma strength function on the cross section exchange data have determined the most compatible type of model.…”

Photonuclear Activation by 20.5-Mev Gamma Rays

“…Recently, Mutsuro (1959) has remeasured the MO 92 (Y,W)MO 91 cross section using a bremsstrahlung beam and detecting the resultant positron activity. His results, however, show a different curve shape and so the differences may be caused by curve analysis, energy calibration, and/or intensity calibration.…”

New measurements of 92Mo(γ, n) and (γ, 3n) reactions using laser-driven bremsstrahlung γ-ray

“…For 92 Mo(γ, n) 91 Mo reaction, 91 Mo can be formed with the isomeric state with a spin of 1/2 − or the ground state with a spin of 9/2 + . A lot of works had reported the cross sections [31][32][33] and IRs [31,[34][35][36][37][38][39] of 92 Mo(γ, n) 91m,g Mo reaction, but the experimental IRs did not match each other very well, especially at high energy region. In the giant dipole resonance (GDR) region, Thiep et al [39] and Davidov et al [37] had a maximum difference of 26%.…”