1979
DOI: 10.1002/andp.19794910404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photonen‐Korrelationen in der spontanen Emission eines Zwei‐Atom‐Systems

Abstract: I n h a l t s u b e r s i c h t . Es wird die Intensitiitskorrelationsfunktion fur die Strahlung eines spontan emittierenden, anfanglich vollst8;ndig angeregten Zwei-Atom-Systems mit Hilfe der Lehm bergschen Mastergleichung und des Quanten-Fluktuations-Regressionstheorems berechnet. Wiihrend des Ausstrahlungsprozesses wechseln sich Bunching-und Antibunchingeffekte der Photonen ab, wobei es von der Beobachtungsrichtung und von dem Abstand der Atome abhangt, welcher dieser Effekte zuerst erscheint. Dabei konnen … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, however, g@) a t first decreases with time and after running through a minimum increases with time, reaches a maximum and then declines to zero. Thereby the maximum toward the end of the emission process is all the more pronounced the smaller the interatomic distance is and a large enhanced photon bunching effect may occur just like in the two-atom radiation [13]. For sufficient small distances gc2) falls off soniewhat below 1 temporarily indicating an antibunching effect in this radiation which is most pronounced if the atomic system in the avarage is half deexcited.…”
Section: Intensity Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, however, g@) a t first decreases with time and after running through a minimum increases with time, reaches a maximum and then declines to zero. Thereby the maximum toward the end of the emission process is all the more pronounced the smaller the interatomic distance is and a large enhanced photon bunching effect may occur just like in the two-atom radiation [13]. For sufficient small distances gc2) falls off soniewhat below 1 temporarily indicating an antibunching effect in this radiation which is most pronounced if the atomic system in the avarage is half deexcited.…”
Section: Intensity Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the following we discuss angular correlat,ions between simultaneously emitted photons which are described by GC2)(ii, t ; fa, t ) given by (28). In the three-atom case G(2) shows a complicated space-time behaviour compared with the expression for an initially fully excited two-atom system G&,m, [13]: nn(il, t ; i,, t ( -4 y t )…”
Section: One-time A4ngnlar Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of doubly excited systems has been considered in great detail by Richter [25], when the intemuclear distance 8 is fixed. Let us notice that [25] uses a master equation approach and the quantum regression theorem.…”
Section: Time Evolution Of the Atomic Operators -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the first effect of such a molecular rotation would be a depolarization of the fluorescence light, which was not observed in the experiment. (ii) Failure of the hypothesis leading to equation (25). -Equation (25) have been obtained assuming an isotropic distribution of recoil axis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2 we consider collective radiation from two emitters near the nanoparticle. The radiation from two emitters is very important problem of superradiance, attracted much attention in the past for emitters without the nanoparticle [11,12]. This problem is relatively simple, but reveals many important details of physics and theory of superradiance: the role of delay in the interaction, show convenient dynamic equations describing radiation from collective states of emitters for various distances between them, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%