2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.195416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photon-stimulated field emission from semiconducting (10,0) and metallic (5,5) carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They also noted that the emission was improved when the end of the tubes were convex rather than flattop. 16 They further showed that the emission behavior of bundles of open and closed tubes were dependent on two factors; whether the tubes were open or closed and the role of proximity field screening by neighboring tubes. 16 Closed tubes are found to emit less current than open tubes and that their field emission ͑FE͒ characteristics are found to be more sensitive to the local electric field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also noted that the emission was improved when the end of the tubes were convex rather than flattop. 16 They further showed that the emission behavior of bundles of open and closed tubes were dependent on two factors; whether the tubes were open or closed and the role of proximity field screening by neighboring tubes. 16 Closed tubes are found to emit less current than open tubes and that their field emission ͑FE͒ characteristics are found to be more sensitive to the local electric field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 They further showed that the emission behavior of bundles of open and closed tubes were dependent on two factors; whether the tubes were open or closed and the role of proximity field screening by neighboring tubes. 16 Closed tubes are found to emit less current than open tubes and that their field emission ͑FE͒ characteristics are found to be more sensitive to the local electric field. Theoretical investigations of field screening due to neighboring tubes are important in explaining the FE characteristics such as threshold field and emission site density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we have not been able to find any presentation by With optical radiation, where the effects of the photon energy may not be neglected, the major correction to these equations is the effect of a resonance between tunneling electrons and a radiation field (Hagmann, 1995A). This resonance, which is caused by reinforcement of the wave function through virtual photon processes, was later confirmed by others (Mayer & Vigneron, 2000;Mayer et al, 2002Mayer et al, , 2003. Figures 1 and 2 show the gain in the power flux density, which increases E 1 and E 2 in Eqs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Figures 1 and 2 show the gain in the power flux density, which increases E 1 and E 2 in Eqs. (4) and (5), for the resonance with tungsten emitters (Mayer & Vigneron, 2000) and (5, 5) armchair (metallic) CNT emitters (Mayer et al, 2002). Modifying Eqs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%