1997
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.56.1592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photon statistics and the optical Stark effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are certain features that can only be described in terms of a quantum-mechanical treatment of the electromagnetic radiation. Among these are all kinds of phenomena that affect the photon statistics, like the generation of squeezed light by nonlinear optical techniques (Fox et al, 1995;Dabbicco et al, 1996) or the optical Stark effect with nonclassical light (Altevogt, Puff, and Zimmermann, 1997). The most important process, however, which requires a quantum description of light, is spontaneous emission.…”
Section: F Carrier-photon Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are certain features that can only be described in terms of a quantum-mechanical treatment of the electromagnetic radiation. Among these are all kinds of phenomena that affect the photon statistics, like the generation of squeezed light by nonlinear optical techniques (Fox et al, 1995;Dabbicco et al, 1996) or the optical Stark effect with nonclassical light (Altevogt, Puff, and Zimmermann, 1997). The most important process, however, which requires a quantum description of light, is spontaneous emission.…”
Section: F Carrier-photon Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While photon number statistics are used quite regularly to characterize the emission from a system, most prominently for identifying single-photon sources [2], the buildup of coherence in lasers [3,4] or Bose-Einstein condensates [5,6], and in dynamic light scattering [7] or fluorescence correlation spectroscopy [8], they are currently not routinely used as a spectroscopic tool, although the important effect of the excitation photon statistics on the excited quasiparticles has been highlighted [9,10] and there have been theoretical predictions for excitation photon-statistics dependencies of several quantities, for example, excitation efficiencies of optically active excitons in nanostructures [11]. The most probable reason for neglecting this degree of freedom in experiments lies in the small amount of light sources which offer tunable photon statistics, although recently advances in this direction have been made experimentally [6,12,13] and theoretically [14][15][16]. It is widely known and well studied that almost every kind of optical amplification adds noise to the amplified signal [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing excitation strength, the difference becomes measurable in a typical pump-probe experiment. 17,27 In our case, the theory predicts differences up to 3% ͑not shown͒. For comparison, in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…15 Addressing the quantum-optical properties of the excitation light, we calculate the electron-light interaction on a microscopic level. 16,17 Self-consistently including photon-statistical and Coulomb effects we predict a measurable and strong impact of the light source on the creation of biexcitons in comparison to the creation of single excitons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%