1931
DOI: 10.1021/j150323a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photomicrographic Studies of Sucrose Crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant solid, spherical microparticles consist of a shellac matrix uniformly loaded with β-carotene, as shown in figure 1d, and exhibit the desired orange colour, as shown in figure 1e. The advantage of using microfluidics is to control the drop size; this is particularly important in food applications, as the tongue is unable to resolve the texture of the particles provided they are smaller than 20 µm [29]. Since the particles are synthesized using single emulsions as templates, particles of desired size are achieved by controlling the size of single emulsions through adjusting the flow rate and changing the size of the device or varying the concentration of polymer in the single emulsions.…”
Section: Preparation Of Monodisperse Colour Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant solid, spherical microparticles consist of a shellac matrix uniformly loaded with β-carotene, as shown in figure 1d, and exhibit the desired orange colour, as shown in figure 1e. The advantage of using microfluidics is to control the drop size; this is particularly important in food applications, as the tongue is unable to resolve the texture of the particles provided they are smaller than 20 µm [29]. Since the particles are synthesized using single emulsions as templates, particles of desired size are achieved by controlling the size of single emulsions through adjusting the flow rate and changing the size of the device or varying the concentration of polymer in the single emulsions.…”
Section: Preparation Of Monodisperse Colour Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of size of particles combined with their medium having an effect on detectability comes from the fact that sugar particles ≥25 µm in chocolate can be detected by the roof of the mouth (Rostagno, 1969), although they cannot be detected in a softer product such as fondant (Woodruff and Gilder, 1931). In smoother, creamier products such as margarine and ice cream, particle detection can vary, with 22 µm particles the minimum size detected in margarine by the mouth, and 55 µm the minimum size detectable in ice cream (Imai et al, 1999).…”
Section: In-mouth Detectability and Factors Affecting Sensorial Detecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roof of the mouth has been cited as capable of detecting particles in chocolate as small as 25 pm (Hinton 1970). Fondants were perceived as smooth when the sugar crystals were 20 pm, but sugar crystals of 25 pm were recognizable in the mouth (Woodruff and Gilder 1931). In margarine, fat crystals had a threshold size for graininess of 22 pm (Vaisey-Genser el al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%