2007
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photometry and models of selected main belt asteroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations and models for different asteroids can be found in the four previous papers of the present series: Michałowski et al (2004Michałowski et al ( , 2005Michałowski et al ( , 2006 and Marciniak et al (2007). The photometric measurements that we perform are relative, and are usually done on small telescopes, for example in Borowiec we use 0.4-m reflector.…”
Section: Photometry Of Three Main Belt Asteroidssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Similar observations and models for different asteroids can be found in the four previous papers of the present series: Michałowski et al (2004Michałowski et al ( , 2005Michałowski et al ( , 2006 and Marciniak et al (2007). The photometric measurements that we perform are relative, and are usually done on small telescopes, for example in Borowiec we use 0.4-m reflector.…”
Section: Photometry Of Three Main Belt Asteroidssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This sample is different from the previous ones (included in Michałowski et al 2004Michałowski et al , 2005Michałowski et al , 2006Marciniak et al 2007Marciniak et al , 2008Marciniak et al , 2009a in the way that it contains only objects with poles of low inclination with respect to the ecliptic. These asteroids were long thought to be nonexistent, because modelling with the amplitude, magnitude, and epoch methods (Zappala & Di Martino 1986, and references therein) did not result in asteroid models with poles lying in the proximity of the 1 Database of Asteroid Models from Inversion Techniques, available at: http://astro.troja.mff.cuni.cz/projects/asteroids3D, described inĎurech et al (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We adopt here the spin-state solution from Marciniak et al (2007), which has a sidereal rotation period of 6.44111 h and two possible pole orientations, namely (λ, β) = (200…”
Section: (184) Dejopejamentioning
confidence: 99%