2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photometric redshifts for gamma-ray burst afterglows from GROND andSwift/UVOT

Abstract: Aims. We present a framework to obtain photometric redshifts (photo-zs) for gamma-ray burst afterglows. Using multi-band photometry from GROND and Swift/UVOT, photo-zs are derived for five GRBs for which spectroscopic redshifts are not available. Methods. We use UV/optical/NIR data and synthetic photometry based on afterglow observations and theory to derive the photometric redshifts of GRBs and their accuracy. Taking into account the afterglow synchrotron emission properties, we investigate the application of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other important factor to consider is that the total SED is obtained by combining the UVOT and GROND data, which are two different instruments, which thus need to be calibrated against each other. Krühler et al (2011) performed this task by combining Swift-UVOT and GROND filter curves, utilizing their spectral overlap and established the following calibration relationship:…”
Section: Variability Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other important factor to consider is that the total SED is obtained by combining the UVOT and GROND data, which are two different instruments, which thus need to be calibrated against each other. Krühler et al (2011) performed this task by combining Swift-UVOT and GROND filter curves, utilizing their spectral overlap and established the following calibration relationship:…”
Section: Variability Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied Eq. (5) from Krühler et al (2011) to evaluate the amplitude of a possible systematic offset between UVOT and GROND data. Since the result is consistent within 2 sigma for all SEDs, we did not apply any correction to the different data sets and conclude that the instrumental cross-calibration is reliable within measurement uncertainties.…”
Section: Near-infrared To X-ray Sedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1) which is valid for −1 ≤ (g − r ) ≤ 2 (Krühler et al 2011). These corrections, Δmag GR→UV (Table 2), were calculated for all sources with accurate photometry in b, g , and r (δm < 0.2 mag).…”
Section: Variability Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%