1991
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-55797-0_82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photometric monitoring of gravitational lenses with the nordic optical telescope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first time delay for the gravitational lens Q0957+561 was measured in 1984 (Florentin-Nielsen 1984), since then more than 11 time delay lenses have been found, including 7 systems with a good quality of the astrometric data and 2 systems with serious problems (Kochanek & Schechter 2003). It would be very interesting if those debatable systems can be explained in the framework of TeVe S. However, we emphasize that the measurement of time delay is controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first time delay for the gravitational lens Q0957+561 was measured in 1984 (Florentin-Nielsen 1984), since then more than 11 time delay lenses have been found, including 7 systems with a good quality of the astrometric data and 2 systems with serious problems (Kochanek & Schechter 2003). It would be very interesting if those debatable systems can be explained in the framework of TeVe S. However, we emphasize that the measurement of time delay is controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was found to be a very challenging measurement to make. Optical (Lloyd 1981;Keel 1982;Florentin-Nielsen 1984;Schild & Cholfin 1986;Vanderriest et al 1989;Schild & Thomson 1995) and radio monitoring programs produced extensive data, but analyses with a host of sophisticated techniques (see, e.g., Press, Rybicki & Hewitt 1992a, 1992bPelt et al 1994Pelt et al , 1996 could not resolve the conflict between groups obtaining delays near 400 days and those finding delays close to 540 days. Only recently has an optical detection of a sharp event in the light curve of each image resulted in a precise determination (∆τ = 417 ± 3 days, Kundić et al 1997), confirming the short value of the delay first obtained by Schild & Cholfin (1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As had already been shown by Refsdal (1966), a value for the Hubble constant which does not rely on the steps of the local distance ladder may be determined from the time delay between the di erent images of the same variable source in such gravitationally lensed systems. The QSO 0957+561 system is the only one where a fairly accurate, although not uncontested, value for the time delay has been obtained (e.g., Florentin-Nielsen 1984;Press, Rybicky, & Hewitt 1992;Pelt et al 1994). However, as was shown rst by Borgeest & Refsdal (1984) and later elaborated by e.g., Falco, Gorenstein, & Shapiro (1991) and Kochanek (1991), a determination of the Hubble constant will not only require a reliable value for the time delay between the two quasar images, but also a well-constrained model for the lensing mass distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%