2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15351.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photometric constraints on white dwarfs and the identification of extreme objects

Abstract: It is possible to reliably identify white dwarfs (WDs) without recourse to spectra, instead using photometric and astrometric measurements to distinguish them from main-sequence stars and quasars. WDs' colours can also be used to infer their intrinsic properties (effective temperature, surface gravity, etc.), but the results obtained must be interpreted with care. The difficulties stem from the existence of a solid angle degeneracy, as revealed by a full exploration of the likelihood, although this can be mask… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically the best δ 4DCD value is not zero because hydrogen white dwarfs are ten times as numerous as helium white dwarfs. These effects can be elegantly treated using the Bayesian formalism developed by Mortlock et al (2008), hereafter MPI08. Here we follow a simpler approach and, informed by the results shown in Figure 6.23, adopt δ 4DCD = −0.05 for the rest of the analysis presented here.…”
Section: Photometric Separation Of Hydrogen and Helium White Dwarfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically the best δ 4DCD value is not zero because hydrogen white dwarfs are ten times as numerous as helium white dwarfs. These effects can be elegantly treated using the Bayesian formalism developed by Mortlock et al (2008), hereafter MPI08. Here we follow a simpler approach and, informed by the results shown in Figure 6.23, adopt δ 4DCD = −0.05 for the rest of the analysis presented here.…”
Section: Photometric Separation Of Hydrogen and Helium White Dwarfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photometric measurements, however, are generally more ambiguous, and some sort of Bayesian approach is required to avoid making overly certain classifications (e.g. Mortlock, Peiris & Ivezić 2009a). For this reason only photometric measurements are considered henceforth.…”
Section: Probabilistic Classification Of Astronomical Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist several different algorithms in the astronomical literature which have been used to estimate stellar parameters from (spectro)photometric data. Without trying to be complete, these include physical line‐based analyses (Beers et al ; Heiter & Luck ), nearest neighbours (often χ 2 ) template‐based methods (Wilhelm, Beers & Gray ; Allernde Prieto et al ; Belikov & Röser ; Straiz˘ys & Lazauskaite ), neural networks or kernel regression (Bailer‐Jones, Irwin & von Hippel ; Winter, Jeffrey & Drilling ; Zhang et al ; Re Fiorentin et al ), methods based on forward modelling schemes (Cayrel et al ; Takeda ; Koleva et al ; Bailer‐Jones ) and Bayesian methods (Hill et al ; Mortlock, Peiris & Ivezić ; Bailer‐Jones ). While these approaches have generally been quite successful, many have been applied either to small data sets or to data sets with a limited and known range of stellar parameters, or they have only attempted to estimate one or two parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%