1988
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(88)90031-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photolysts of rhodamine-WT dye

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the observed errors, the values of the constant are identical for distilled water and Loosdrecht water, indicating that photolysis in Loosdrecht water is determined by direct photolysis (i.e. no photosensitizers are present in the water) (Zepp and Cline 1977;Tai and Rathbun 1988).…”
Section: Photolysis Of Rhodamine Wtmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Within the observed errors, the values of the constant are identical for distilled water and Loosdrecht water, indicating that photolysis in Loosdrecht water is determined by direct photolysis (i.e. no photosensitizers are present in the water) (Zepp and Cline 1977;Tai and Rathbun 1988).…”
Section: Photolysis Of Rhodamine Wtmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The potential for turbidity to impact upon our field study was assessed by measuring a range of RWT solutions prepared using water from our field site, and no significant deviation from expected fluorescence was observed hence any possible effects of turbulence on RWT fluorescence measurements were ignored for the remainder of the study. A number of studies have also demonstrated that the use of RWT in quantitative studies may be compromised by photochemical decay of RWT over time (Smart and Laidlaw, 1977;Tai and Rathbun, 1988;Suijlen and Buyse, 1994;Upstill-Godard et al, 2001;Dierburg and C. H. Mines et al: Use of rhodamine WT as proxy for point source pollutants DeBusk, 2005) and loss of RWT due to adsorption (Smart and Laidlaw, 1977;Wilson et al, 1986;Sabatini and Austin, 1991;Shiau et al, 1993;Di Fazio and Vurro, 1994;Soerens et al, 1994;Kasnavia et al, 1999;Close et al, 2002;Keefe et al, 2004;Kung et al, 2000;Vasudevan et al, 2001;Lin et al, 2003;Pang et al, 2003;Richardson et al, 2004;Dierburg and DeBusk, 2005) but as the work described here focused on the use of RWT within a closed pipe surface water drainage network these potential losses were deemed insignificant and not re-examined. Given this range of potential compromising factors, the inconsistent nature of field results concerning RWT fate and transport (Tai and Rathbun, 1988;Jones and Jung, 1990;Suijlen and Buyse, 1994;Ptak and Schmid, 1996;Kung et al, 2000;Upstill-Godard et al, 2001;Close et al, 2002;Lin et al, 2003) is unsurprising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although RWT has been used as a surface and groundwater tracer since its formation in 1968, its use in quantitative tracer studies has been shown to be compromised by quenching of RWT fluorescence at pH values below 5 (Smart and Laidlaw, 1977;Tai and Rathbun, 1988;Kasnavia et al, 1999) and by dissolved salts (Smart and Laidlaw, 1977); fluorescence intensity of RWT varying inversely with temperature (Smart and Laidlaw, 1977;Wilson et al, 1986); and occasionally elevated background fluorescence in natural waters (Smart and Karunaratne, 2002). Previous work has also demonstrated that turbidity may significantly interfere with fluorescence measurements given the ability of suspended solids to contribute to background fluorescence (Smart and Laidlaw, 1977), and the use of fluorometers must be questioned in turbid environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molarity (M) was determined from UV-visible analysis of selected dye solutions (absorbances at 490 and 550 nm for fluorescein and rhodamine WT, respectively) and published extinction coefficients (65,000 M -1 cm -1 at pH 7 and 490 nm for fluorescein, Mota et al 1991;and 87,000 M -1 cm -1 for rhodamine WT at pH 5.6 and 550 nm, Tai and Rathbun 1988). Shiau et al (1993) report that the different isomers of rhodamine WT, while varying in light absorption characteristics in the UV range, show very similar absorption at higher wavelengths; therefore we feel confident applying a published extinction coefficient at 550 nm even if the proportional isomer composition may be different in our rhodamine WT solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%