2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoluminescent Carbon Nanostructures

Abstract: SUDOLSKA, M.; PRAMANIK, G.; CIGLER*, P.; OTYEPKA, M.; ZBORIL, R.; Chem. Mater. 28 (2016) 12, 4085-4128, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01372 ; Inst. Org. Chem. Biochem., Acad. Sci. Czech Rep., CZ-166 10 Prague 6, Czech Republic; Eng.) -Schramke 33-208

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
142
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 573 publications
(1,141 reference statements)
4
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 2c and d, all the initial geometries in the 30 trajectories at the FC point have an S 1 -S 0 state energy difference of~3.0 eV; soon after starting the simulation, there is a quick decrease in energy to approximately 2.3 eV, corresponding to the S 1 state minima, as predicted by TD-DFT geometry optimization. [37] It is predictable that such fast nonradiative decays can be a nonnegligible competitor to the radiative decay channels and thus affect the luminescent efficiencies of the materials. [32] In contrast, the other 20 trajectories only show deviations in the emission energies around the equilibrium (~2.3 eV) until the end of the simulation (at the final step of these 20 trajectories, the oscillator strengths of the S 1 -S 0 transitions are predicted to vary from 0.0772 to 0.1604, proving the optically allowed nature of the transitions; see Table S3 for details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2c and d, all the initial geometries in the 30 trajectories at the FC point have an S 1 -S 0 state energy difference of~3.0 eV; soon after starting the simulation, there is a quick decrease in energy to approximately 2.3 eV, corresponding to the S 1 state minima, as predicted by TD-DFT geometry optimization. [37] It is predictable that such fast nonradiative decays can be a nonnegligible competitor to the radiative decay channels and thus affect the luminescent efficiencies of the materials. [32] In contrast, the other 20 trajectories only show deviations in the emission energies around the equilibrium (~2.3 eV) until the end of the simulation (at the final step of these 20 trajectories, the oscillator strengths of the S 1 -S 0 transitions are predicted to vary from 0.0772 to 0.1604, proving the optically allowed nature of the transitions; see Table S3 for details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene is a two-dimensional (2D) carbon allotrope containing Sp2 bonded carbon atoms, which are arranged hexagonally isolated from its parent material, graphite (Kozak et al, 2016). Graphene has shown its potential in diverse fields because of its distinctive magnetism, electronic and mechanical properties (Chang, Yan, Shang, & Liu, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5s hows that PFO with 10 %m ass of Y 3 N@C 80 has an ew band at 708 nm owing to the electro-luminescence of Y 3 N@C 80 ,which is absent in the device made from pure PFO.The quantum yield of Y 3 N@C 80 is rather low at room temperature for an efficient application, but afurther increase of the QY may be achieved via derivatization, [7b] by changing the temperature (Figure 1), or by supramolecular assemblies. [22] Ac o-existence of PFO fluorescence and Y 3 N@C 80 luminescence in Figure 5a lso indicates that the energy transfer in this device is not very efficient and needs further optimization.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 98%