1991
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(91)80013-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoionization mass spectrometry of kinetic energy-selected ions. An ion retarding potential difference method applied to NO+ and O+ from N2O

Abstract: A new method is described to obtain photoionization efficiency curves of kinetic energy-selected fragment ions. The method is tested and discussed in the case of the dissociative photoionization yields of NO + and O + from N 2 O. The attention is focussed on the dissociative autoionization processes in the threshold region, in the FranckCondon region of the N 2 O (à 2 Σ + ) state and in the Franck-Condon gap between the à 2 Σ + and 2 Π states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the lower E and D regions it undergoes reactions [Krankowsky et al, 1987; National Bureau of Standards, 1975] with other atmospheric gases and plays an important role in the clustering of proton hydrates. Since NO + can result from the ionization of NO and dissociative ionization of N20, many studies [Elan& 1973;Brehm et al, 1974;Nenner et al, 1980;Olivier et al, 1982;Ibuki and Sugita, 1984;Olivier et al, 1984;Hamdan et al, 1987;Locht et al, 1991;Takahashi et al, 1991] have been directed toward photon and electron impact ionization and fragmentation properties of these molecules. However, to date, there have been a very few measurements on the electron impact ionization and dissociative ionization cross sections of them which are important for modeling the Earth's ionosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lower E and D regions it undergoes reactions [Krankowsky et al, 1987; National Bureau of Standards, 1975] with other atmospheric gases and plays an important role in the clustering of proton hydrates. Since NO + can result from the ionization of NO and dissociative ionization of N20, many studies [Elan& 1973;Brehm et al, 1974;Nenner et al, 1980;Olivier et al, 1982;Ibuki and Sugita, 1984;Olivier et al, 1984;Hamdan et al, 1987;Locht et al, 1991;Takahashi et al, 1991] have been directed toward photon and electron impact ionization and fragmentation properties of these molecules. However, to date, there have been a very few measurements on the electron impact ionization and dissociative ionization cross sections of them which are important for modeling the Earth's ionosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of this work was to apply the ion retarding potential difference (IRPD) method [9] to resonance phenomena to obtain translational energy distributions at several wavelengths. In the case of N + /N 2 the dissociative ionization in the inner-shell ionization energy region has been extensively investigated [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental setup used in this photoionization work has been described elsewhere [9,11] and only the most salient features will be repeated here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 The role of bending in the dissociation process of the N 2 O ϩ (B 2 ⌸) state is also invoked in a recent theoretical study of the predissociation mechanisms of the A 2 ⌺ ϩ and B 2 ⌸ states of N 2 O ϩ . 18 Investigations of the kinetic energy distribution or kinetic energy releases of the photoions in TPEPICO studies, 16 mass spectrometry of kinetic energy selected ions, 19 or PEPICO spectroscopy at fixed wavelengths 20 have lead to the attribution of dissociation limits populated by DPI via the B state. To our knowledge, the previously reported angular information about these DPI processes concern the angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of N 2 O in the 14 -70 eV photon energy range 21 which shows that the ␤ e asymmetry parameter for ionization of the 1 orbital increases significantly with the ionization energy, varying from 0.08 to 0.32 in the 18 -21 eV presently explored photon energy range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%