1991
DOI: 10.1104/pp.95.4.1049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoinhibition of Stem Elongation by Blue and Red Light

Abstract: The underlying mechanism of photoinhibition of stem elongation by blue (BL) and red light (RL) was studied in etiolated seedlings of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska). Brief and r = L(Ar -P)in which 0 is the cell wall yield coefficient, Y is the yield threshold (the turgor pressure that must be exceeded for wall yielding to occur), P is turgor pressure, Air is the difference in osmotic pressure, and L is the cell hydraulic conductance (8,21,23

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth of dark-adapted cucumber hypocotyls (Cosgrove, 1981) and red-light-grown (Laskoswki and Briggs, 1989) and dark-adapted (Kigel and Cosgrove, 1991) pea internodes was rapidly inhibited after the onset of continuous blue light, but remained fully inhibited over a period of stimulation that exceeds the transient phase of the protoplast shrinking response identified in our studies. In fact, the transient phase of growth inhibition has so far been found only with maize coleoptiles.…”
Section: Protoplast Shrinking Response and Its Relationship To Growthmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Growth of dark-adapted cucumber hypocotyls (Cosgrove, 1981) and red-light-grown (Laskoswki and Briggs, 1989) and dark-adapted (Kigel and Cosgrove, 1991) pea internodes was rapidly inhibited after the onset of continuous blue light, but remained fully inhibited over a period of stimulation that exceeds the transient phase of the protoplast shrinking response identified in our studies. In fact, the transient phase of growth inhibition has so far been found only with maize coleoptiles.…”
Section: Protoplast Shrinking Response and Its Relationship To Growthmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is unclear how GL may activate phytochrome to respond in a manner completely at opposition to its well-documented effects on growth inhibition (Mandoli and Briggs, 1981;Gaba et al, 1984;Kigel and Cosgrove, 1991). The definitive evidence that GL-induced growth promotion is not a phytochrome response is presented in Figure 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Excitation of phytochromes by GL with even extremely dim red light results in a decrease in stem elongation rate (Mandoli and Briggs, 1981;Gaba et al, 1991;Kigel and Cosgrove, 1991). Examination of the action spectra for stem growth elongation in Arabidopsis indicates that GL (525 nm) treatment leads to a slightly longer hypocotyl (Goto et al, 1993) that is unaffected by the hy2 mutation.…”
Section: Genetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, an oilseed rape mutant that overproduces gibberellins is missing a phytochrome (Rood et al, 1990;Devlin et al, 1992). Farther down the pathway, changes in cell wall properties probably account for the increased cell elongation in hypocotyls, root hairs, and other tissues (Taiz, 1984;Casal et al, 1990;Kigel and Cosgrove, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%