2010
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201000645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoinduced Processes in Fluorene‐Bridged Rhenium–Phenothiazine Dyads – Comparison of Electron Transfer Across Fluorene, Phenylene, and Xylene Bridges

Abstract: The photoinduced processes occurring after pulsed laser excitation of a series of donor–bridge–acceptor molecules comprising a phenothiazine electron donor, variable‐length fluorene bridges, and a rhenium(I) electron acceptor were investigated. A dyad with a single fluorene bridge unit exhibits electron transfer from phenothiazine to the rhenium(I) complex upon photoexcitation, whereas in dyads with fluorene oligomers bridge‐localized triplet excited states are formed rather than electron transfer products. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One should note that the LCCT state is not charge separated; both the donor and the acceptor orbitals have overlap and thus appreciable 3 (π → π*) character. A number of good examples of charge-separated states have been studied, and they are characterized with shortlived excited states which show electron tunneling through spacer groups 51,52 which are not present in [Re(CO) 3 Cl-(DPA)] + While the SOMOs of the Cl − and py complexes appear almost identical, the HOMO of the former is metal based (not shown), which is consistent with a smaller energy gap between the dπ and the π L orbitals. As can be seen from Figure 12a, the transients of the peaks at 418 and 555 nm persist for longer than depletion of the ground state.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should note that the LCCT state is not charge separated; both the donor and the acceptor orbitals have overlap and thus appreciable 3 (π → π*) character. A number of good examples of charge-separated states have been studied, and they are characterized with shortlived excited states which show electron tunneling through spacer groups 51,52 which are not present in [Re(CO) 3 Cl-(DPA)] + While the SOMOs of the Cl − and py complexes appear almost identical, the HOMO of the former is metal based (not shown), which is consistent with a smaller energy gap between the dπ and the π L orbitals. As can be seen from Figure 12a, the transients of the peaks at 418 and 555 nm persist for longer than depletion of the ground state.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent study comparing charge transport in structurally similar bridges is the work of Wenger et al on D-B-A molecules linked by phenylene-based bridges. 25 They investigated hole tunneling in D-B-A systems with a rhenium(I) complex as a hole donor and phenothiazine as a hole acceptor. The donor-acceptor couple was connected either by two phenyls (ph 2 ), two xylene groups (xy 2 ) or a fluorene group (fl 1 ) (see Table 1).…”
Section: Using Structurally Identical Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different molecular bridges have been used to link Ds and As. Typical bridges in DBA systems comprise oligo-phenylenevinylenes (oPVs), [18][19][20][21][22] oligophenyleneethynylenes (oPEs), [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] oligo-fluorenes (oFls), [30][31][32][33] oligo-vinylfluorenes, 34 ladder-OFls, 35 oligothiophenes, [36][37][38] oligo-vinylthiophenes, 39 oligo(ethynylene-10,20-porphyrindiyl-ethynylene)s, 40 oligo-phenylenes, [41][42][43][44][45] and others. 3,46 It is noteworthy that oligoynes [(C≡C) n ] have only been partially studied as bridge units in this context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%