2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoinduced electron transfer from anatase to rutile in partially reduced TiO2 (P-25) nanoparticles: An ESR study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
76
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The E FB is usually obtained from Mott-Schottky plots from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, as well as by some other electrochemical and spectro-electrochemical techniques [7][8][9]. The spectro/photo/ electrochemical measurements by Jankulovska et al [8] confirmed the positive offset of 0.2 eV between the CBMs of anatase and rutile, and other measurements, like EPR [10], photoluminescence [11], photocatalytic Ag + reduction [12,13] and H 2 evolution [14] on mixed-phase particles, also reported the CBM of anatase being higher than that of rutile. In contrast to these works, all photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) studies -carried out on layers in electrical contact and in a vacuum environment -seem to agree that the CBM of rutile is lying higher [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The E FB is usually obtained from Mott-Schottky plots from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, as well as by some other electrochemical and spectro-electrochemical techniques [7][8][9]. The spectro/photo/ electrochemical measurements by Jankulovska et al [8] confirmed the positive offset of 0.2 eV between the CBMs of anatase and rutile, and other measurements, like EPR [10], photoluminescence [11], photocatalytic Ag + reduction [12,13] and H 2 evolution [14] on mixed-phase particles, also reported the CBM of anatase being higher than that of rutile. In contrast to these works, all photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) studies -carried out on layers in electrical contact and in a vacuum environment -seem to agree that the CBM of rutile is lying higher [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Strong interfacial regions between the phases have been suggested to facilitate charge transfer. [22][23][24] Other work attributes special four-coordinated Ti interfacial sites as contributing to the increased photo reactivity. 9,15,25,26 Band offsets at semiconductor heterojunctions are fundamental parameters which govern the transport properties of electrons, and the differences in energy of the bands determine the direction and magnitude of the electrical current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komaguchi et al [47] also show evidence for electron transfer from anatase to rutile due to the presence of trapping sites. Pure phase anatase and rutile as well as P25 catalysts were partially reduced and then subjected to light of wavelength less than the rutile BG.…”
Section: Rutile and Anatase Polymorphs Of Tiomentioning
confidence: 93%
“…From UV Raman spectra of the 700-750°C calcined catalysts, the authors confirm that both rutile and anatase coexist at the surface and therefore have surface phase junctions. It has been postulated by many authors [23,25,39,[46][47][48] that it is the presence of surface phase junctions in mixed phase TiO 2 that facilitates the electron transfer between the two phases upon photoexcitation and therefore improves charge separation, reduces recombination and subsequently increases photocatalytic activity.…”
Section: Rutile and Anatase Polymorphs Of Tiomentioning
confidence: 99%